Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 25, Issue 23
Share on Social
The Rise of Fake Copyright C&D Letters (And How Not to Get Taken In)
By Kristyn Webb
If your inbox has been serving up dramatic “copyright infringement” cease and desist letters lately, you’re not imagining it. Scam C&Ds are having a moment. Fraudsters are churning out emails that look just real enough to intimidate businesses into paying “settlement fees” or clicking malware links. And yes—our own firm was targeted by one of these, so trust me, they’re everywhere.
These scams usually follow the same formula: a stern email claiming you stole a photo, logo, or piece of content; a threat of litigation or a DMCA complaint; and a hyperlink inviting you to “review the infringing material.” That link? Often, it’s phishing, malware, or a fake invoice. Actual copyright holders don’t email you a Dropbox link with a virus. For real examples of such scams, see sample alerts from the Australian Cyber Security Centre and others.
A recent twist: scammers claiming rights in foreign jurisdictions—“You infringed our EU/UK/India-registered image,” even though your business has never touched anything remotely related. Sounds sophisticated, but the details usually fall apart. See how one university flagged a submission via a web form that demanded payment for “up to $140,000” in damages.
So how do you spot the red flags? Start with the sender. Real firms use real domains, not Gmail, ProtonMail, or “rights-enforcement-global.co.” Then watch for mismatched facts, bad grammar, legal phrasing no practicing attorney would ever use, or any demand for payment within 24–48 hours.
If something feels even slightly off, don’t click anything and don’t reply. Save the email, screenshot it, and send it to your IP counsel. We can quickly tell whether you’re dealing with a real dispute or just someone playing dress-up as a law firm.
Bottom line: stay skeptical, stay safe, and keep scammers from turning your inbox into their side hustle.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group and holds a master’s degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
