Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Newsletter – Volume 26, Issue 22
Share on Social
What’s in a Name? Why Trademark Clearance Matters
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla, SpaceX, and the name “Terafab” offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem if someone else got there first.
In September 2026, Tesla, SpaceX, and SpaceXAI filed a federal lawsuit asking the court to declare that their use of TERAFAB for a planned semiconductor manufacturing operation does not infringe trademark rights asserted by nanotechnology company TERA-print. TERA-print owns a federal registration for TERA-FAB and reportedly sent a cease-and-desist letter after Tesla filed applications for TERAFAB and TESLA TERAFAB earlier this year.
The dispute highlights a common misconception: filing a trademark application, or even entity-name availability with a state agency, does not necessarily mean a brand is clear to use. Trademark disputes can arise even when the parties do not offer identical products. The analysis generally focuses on whether consumers are likely to be confused based on factors including the similarity of the marks, the parties’ goods or services, and the state of the relevant marketplace.
That makes timing important. By the time a company announces a new brand, it may already have invested in marketing, websites, packaging, product development, and customer recognition. Discovering a trademark problem after launch can mean litigation, rebranding, or both.
The takeaway is simple: search before you launch. A trademark clearance review can identify potentially conflicting trademark registrations, pending applications, and earlier marketplace uses before significant resources are committed to a brand. In an era where a new name can go viral overnight, a little trademark diligence upfront can save a lot of trouble later.
Kameron is a partner and registered patent attorney at Fishman Stewart PLLC, specializing in Intellectual Property with over a decade of experience counseling clients on patent, trademark, and related contractual matters. Kameron’s practice encompasses all aspects of preparing, procuring, and enforcing worldwide IP rights. Check out his full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
