Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 24, Issue 16
Share on Social
The Battle to Protect “WORDLE”
By Linda M. Callaghan
The online word game Wordle was created in 2021 by Josh Wardle and quickly rose in popularity. Players receive a new puzzle daily with six chances to correctly guess a five-letter word of the day with limited clues.
Recognizing the surging trend among users, The New York Times Company (“NYT”) purchased the game in 2022. Many families separated due to COVID started using the game to stay in touch by texting each other or sharing on social media the number of tries it took them to correctly solve the puzzle. Millions have played the game.
However, together with the rise in the game’s popularity has been an increasing number of copycat games popping up. For instance, Nerdle is an online math guessing game and Heardle is an online music guessing game.
This begs the question: how close can competitors come without infringing on the NYT’s intellectual property rights in WORDLE? We may soon find out.
Kory McDonald, owner of Worldle LLC, filed U.S. trademark application no. 97455658 for WORLDLE to protect an online geography guessing game. The NYT has taken offense to “WORLDLE” and opposed the trademark application arguing the term is too close in spelling to “WORDLE” with only one additional letter to differentiate the two online games. The NYT opposed the application. Mr. McDonald, however, believes the differences between a geography versus word challenge and the inclusion of “world” in WORLDLE versus “word” in WORDLE are sufficient to avoid confusion between the two.
In addition, University Games Corporation came out with a tabletop board game called “5-Letter Wordlet,” which incorporates the identical game strategy as Wordle with players guessing a five letter word in six attempts, only, not online. The board game also bears a striking resemblance to the online game, sharing a similar green and grey color scheme and game board layout.
It is the use of term, “Wordlet,” that appears most troublesome to the NYT. NYT opposed University Games’ trademark application for 5-LETTER WORDLET filed for “board games; tabletop games.” In the opposition, NYT states that consumers will be confused as to the source of the board game and incorrectly believe there is an association with NYT’s online WORDLE game. One factor in the NYT’s favor is the customer review section for the board game on Amazon where a few purchasers indicate they view the board game as affiliated with the online Wordle game, indicating there is probably some consumer confusion already between the NYT’s WORDLE and University Game’s 5-LETTER WORDLET.
Only time will tell the fate of these WORDLE competitors, but one thing is certain, the NYT is vigorously protecting its intellectual property rights in its wildly popular online game.
Linda is a Partner at Fishman Stewart, specializing in intellectual property law. Linda focuses mainly on trademark and copyright law, including foreign and domestic prosecution and litigation, as well as agreements and assignments. Check out her full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
L.A.B. Golf aims to protect its innovations, and therefore its market position, owning three patents for its zero-torque design. The question now is whether L.A.B. Golf can withstand the wave of copycat designs.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
Our latest article tackles three common trademark questions: 1. Can I trademark my own name? 2. Can I trademark the name of a fictional character? 3. Can I trademark the name of a U.S. president or British royal?
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
Like the titles of single creative works, character names do not generate trademark rights unless used for a series of creative works (meaning two or more). A year ago, Jane Wick, LLC filed a trademark application for the mark JANE WICK in logo format.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
We know that as of June 4, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had issued more than twelve million patents. We also know that more than 10,000 patents were in existence before the count began.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
In the age of the internet, memes are a universal language. A meme is a piece of content, typically an image, video, text, or a combination of these, that spreads rapidly across the internet, often with humorous, relatable, or satirical undertones.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
