Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 25, Issue 11
Share on Social
Technology Digs Deep Under Pyramids
By Kristyn Webb
The Great Pyramid of Giza is one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World—and the only one still standing. It is one of three pyramids at the Giza plateau in Egypt. Really, all three are triumphs of architecture and construction. Their dimensions and positions align with the stars of the Orion Belt, and measurements of their prominent features yield numbers that equate to lightspeed measurements. The size of these monuments is staggering. Millions of stone blocks cut to precise dimensions, weighing thousands of pounds apiece, quarried and transported from miles away and then placed precisely to create one of the greatest engineering feats humankind has ever accomplished. Recently discovered evidence points to hydraulic-powered mechanics used in construction. All of this was done at a time in history when mammoths still walked the earth.
People have long pondered whether or not the Giza pyramids were indeed solely burial chambers, which was the only known, and archaeologically determined, use—until now. Recently, Fillipo Biondi (University of Strathclyde) and Corrado Malanga (University of Pisa) used cutting edge technology to produce scans that reveal, what they speculate, may be a vast network of underground tunnels extending below the largest of the three pyramids called Khafre, which towers 471 feet high (143 meters).
SAR technology (synthetic aperture radar) differs from other scanning technology. SAR is performed from a moving source, like a plane or a satellite, and uses short or high wavelength microwaves to construct two- or three-dimensional images. LIDAR (which uses lasers) can be conducted by plane but is weather dependent and can be blocked by cloud coverage. Ground penetrating radar can detect objects beneath the ground surface, but requires a ground-based system to operate, and thus, is often limited to relatively small geographic areas. In other words, it cannot cover as much ground as SAR.
The team used SAR to measure how vibrational energy moves within a solid substance, like the earth and the stones used to construct the pyramids. Traditional SAR scans measure vibrations over time and average the vibrations. This tends to give high spatial resolution (sharp images with fine details), but like a long-exposure snapshot, vibrations tend to be blurry. Here, the researchers used SAR to take a scan with a shorter synthetic aperture. From there, they broke the scan up into sub-apertures and extrapolated data. This is sort of like taking a series of high shutter-speed snapshots and then making a flipbook to see the movement in action.
According to Biondi and his team, the scans suggest that there are massive hollow tubes descending straight down underneath the pyramid terminating in two cube-shaped structures. The initial estimates indicate the underground network of tubes, tunnels, and chambers extends 6,500 feet wide (nearly 2,000 meters) and 2,000-4,000 feet down (over 600-1,200 meters).
As far as scientific and archeological methods, this method is novel, or “groundbreaking” if you like the pun. So, it is uncertain how accurate the results are, or whether Biondi’s interpretation of the scans will be substantiated if any excavations are authorized. Egyptologists are divided on the issue, some calling the findings an “exaggeration” or “completely wrong.” Egyptian government officials are denouncing the so-called discovery as a conspiracy theory supported by nothing more than pseudo-science.
Will these findings justify further excavations? Are the pyramids more than mausoleums? Is there an underworld underneath the structures? Is it guarded by Osiris? Most importantly, will Brendan Fraser step up if needed? Yet, only time will tell the story of these timeless structures.
Kristyn Webb is an attorney with Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a master’s degree in copyright law from King’s College London.


Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
The fun internet trend of promoting "dupes" has officially crossed the trademark line and everyday content creators are finding themselves in the crosshairs of multimillion-dollar corporate lawsuits.
The FIFA World Cup is global football (or soccer) at its highest level. It is, however, also one of the most carefully crafted displays of intellectual property (IP) in the world.
Trademark owners are often cast as villains when they send cease-and-desist letters. But in trademark law, failing to enforce rights can sometimes create bigger problems than enforcing them.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®

