Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 25, Issue 8
Share on Social
Calling All Copyright Small Claims!
By Kristyn Webb
In 2020, tucked inside the COVID-19 relief bill, was a piece of copyright legislation that created a new forum for hearing certain kinds of copyright disputes. The Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement (“CASE”) Act, created a three-person tribunal housed inside the Copyright Office, called the Copyright Claims Board (“CCB”) to preside over a small-claims court for copyright cases.
Generally, federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over copyright cases, and often, this presents an insurmountable paywall for individual artists and small businesses to vindicate their rights, especially where the value of the individual copyrighted works are relatively low. Many attorneys decline to take on cases where the cost of litigation outweighs any potential recovery. This small-claims court is aimed, in part, to remedy this issue.
The CCB has been hearing cases since June 2022. So far, it has had mixed reviews. The CCB, often called the “Copyright Small Claims Court,” was designed to be a low cost, efficient forum to adjudicate copyright infringement cases that otherwise may not be heard in court due to the high cost of federal litigation. Part of the cost-saving strategy was making proceedings online, with limited discovery, and user-friendly online forms to make out a claim or defense without necessitating formal legal representation, meaning hiring an attorney would be optional.
However, many users are finding that instead of a promised land of easy-to-use tools and streamlined, simple processes, the CCB has been more of a mirage where users are struggling to understand the necessary elements needed to make a proper legal claim of copyright infringement. Many cases are being dismissed before the alleged infringer is even made aware that a filing has been made.
Now the Copyright Office is actively seeking comments on the CCB’s performance. If you have had an experience with the CCB—good, bad, or otherwise—now is your chance to make your voice heard.
Kristyn Webb is an attorney with Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a master’s degree in copyright law from King’s College London.


Related Content from Fishman Stewart
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
The fun internet trend of promoting "dupes" has officially crossed the trademark line and everyday content creators are finding themselves in the crosshairs of multimillion-dollar corporate lawsuits.
The FIFA World Cup is global football (or soccer) at its highest level. It is, however, also one of the most carefully crafted displays of intellectual property (IP) in the world.
Trademark owners are often cast as villains when they send cease-and-desist letters. But in trademark law, failing to enforce rights can sometimes create bigger problems than enforcing them.
Women’s sports are having a moment, and not a small one. And right alongside that rise: the business of women’s sports is heating up, including some surprisingly dramatic trademark battles.
The idea that someone might “own” a piece of DNA raises a slightly uncomfortable question: can you really patent something that exists inside all of us?
Forbes reported that more than 1.5 million bots on an AI agent-driven social network appear to have created a new religion for themselves, the Church of Molt, with congregants adopting the name of “Crustafarians.”
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®

