Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 27
Share on Social

Taylor Swift: David versus Goliath
Taylor Swift has had an incredible 2023. Her “Eras Tour” has been a massive success, becoming one of the most profitable tours for an artist of all time. The release of the concert film of the tour became the highest-grossing concert film of all time. Swift had 10 wins at the 2023 Billboard Music Awards including top artist and top selling song for “Anti-Hero.” Swift was also named a billionaire this year by “Forbes,” the magazine noting that her net worth primarily derives from her music rather than side hustles such as beauty brands or alcohol investments. Just this week, moreover, Swift made history as “Person of the Year” according to “Time” magazine.
An additional achievement for Swift this year, however, harkens back to our “FishBits” discussing how Taylor Swift has been taking back her copyright by re-recording her earlier albums to undermine the value of her original master recordings, which had been sold to her arch enemy, Scooter Braun. Swift re-released another two albums in 2023, “Speak Now” and “1989.” Dropped a little more than a month ago on October 27, 2023, “1989” already has more than 1.65 million sales!
In response to the tremendous success of the “Taylor’s Version” re-recordings, record companies are determined to keep artists from ever doing again what Taylor Swift has accomplished. As reported by “Billboard,” major labels such as Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group have recently overhauled contracts for new signees, some demanding artists wait an unprecedented 10, 15 or even 30 years to re-record releases after departing their record companies. Nor are the labels generally willing to negotiate the new terms.
The response from independent artists may make things worse for the record companies. They are actively redefining the music industry by harnessing online marketplaces or their fan bases directly to engage financial support in an approach that mirrors venture capital investments, effectively circumventing the requirement for a record deal where the label owns everything. I am an “investor” in one such enterprise, a bluegrass band called “The Petersens.” I have happily attended concerts and purchased albums dropped by the family. I even received a holiday card with a sticker in the mail thanking me for my support!
Many Taylor Swift songs can be interpreted through the lens of the biblical David versus Goliath story. The theme of underdogs versus giants is explored in such songs as “Bad Blood,” “Mean,” “Long Live,” and “The Story of Us.” Triumph through vulnerability is expressed in “Sparks Fly,” “Blank Space,” “Delicate,” “Never Grow Up,” and “Wildest Dreams.” The reclaiming of power is the subject of such Taylor Swift songs as “End Game,” “I Did Something Bad,” “The Archer,” “Look What You Made Me Do,” and “Shake It Off.”
At only 33 years of age, Swift has slain her Goliath and is appropriately recognized as a juggernaut in the music industry. She is well deserving of the successes she has achieved. Yet, Swift’s influence goes far beyond her music, and she has been a catalyst in reworking the fabric of an entire industry including the rise of indie groups not beholden to record companies. What will be next?
Michael Stewart is a founding member of Fishman Stewart. He has worked in a wide range of technical areas including information technology, e-commerce, telecommunications, and mechanical, aerospace, computer, and nuclear engineering. His practice includes domestic and foreign patent prosecution, e-commerce and information technology, patent opinions, intellectual property litigation, domestic and foreign trademark prosecution, trademark opinions, copyrights, trade secrets, rights of publicity, intellectual property evaluations/due diligence and drafting and negotiating technology and intellectual property agreements. Check out his full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
L.A.B. Golf aims to protect its innovations, and therefore its market position, owning three patents for its zero-torque design. The question now is whether L.A.B. Golf can withstand the wave of copycat designs.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
Our latest article tackles three common trademark questions: 1. Can I trademark my own name? 2. Can I trademark the name of a fictional character? 3. Can I trademark the name of a U.S. president or British royal?
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
Like the titles of single creative works, character names do not generate trademark rights unless used for a series of creative works (meaning two or more). A year ago, Jane Wick, LLC filed a trademark application for the mark JANE WICK in logo format.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
We know that as of June 4, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had issued more than twelve million patents. We also know that more than 10,000 patents were in existence before the count began.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
In the age of the internet, memes are a universal language. A meme is a piece of content, typically an image, video, text, or a combination of these, that spreads rapidly across the internet, often with humorous, relatable, or satirical undertones.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
