Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 27
Share on Social
Taylor Swift: David versus Goliath
Taylor Swift has had an incredible 2023. Her “Eras Tour” has been a massive success, becoming one of the most profitable tours for an artist of all time. The release of the concert film of the tour became the highest-grossing concert film of all time. Swift had 10 wins at the 2023 Billboard Music Awards including top artist and top selling song for “Anti-Hero.” Swift was also named a billionaire this year by “Forbes,” the magazine noting that her net worth primarily derives from her music rather than side hustles such as beauty brands or alcohol investments. Just this week, moreover, Swift made history as “Person of the Year” according to “Time” magazine.
An additional achievement for Swift this year, however, harkens back to our “FishBits” discussing how Taylor Swift has been taking back her copyright by re-recording her earlier albums to undermine the value of her original master recordings, which had been sold to her arch enemy, Scooter Braun. Swift re-released another two albums in 2023, “Speak Now” and “1989.” Dropped a little more than a month ago on October 27, 2023, “1989” already has more than 1.65 million sales!
In response to the tremendous success of the “Taylor’s Version” re-recordings, record companies are determined to keep artists from ever doing again what Taylor Swift has accomplished. As reported by “Billboard,” major labels such as Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group have recently overhauled contracts for new signees, some demanding artists wait an unprecedented 10, 15 or even 30 years to re-record releases after departing their record companies. Nor are the labels generally willing to negotiate the new terms.
The response from independent artists may make things worse for the record companies. They are actively redefining the music industry by harnessing online marketplaces or their fan bases directly to engage financial support in an approach that mirrors venture capital investments, effectively circumventing the requirement for a record deal where the label owns everything. I am an “investor” in one such enterprise, a bluegrass band called “The Petersens.” I have happily attended concerts and purchased albums dropped by the family. I even received a holiday card with a sticker in the mail thanking me for my support!
Many Taylor Swift songs can be interpreted through the lens of the biblical David versus Goliath story. The theme of underdogs versus giants is explored in such songs as “Bad Blood,” “Mean,” “Long Live,” and “The Story of Us.” Triumph through vulnerability is expressed in “Sparks Fly,” “Blank Space,” “Delicate,” “Never Grow Up,” and “Wildest Dreams.” The reclaiming of power is the subject of such Taylor Swift songs as “End Game,” “I Did Something Bad,” “The Archer,” “Look What You Made Me Do,” and “Shake It Off.”
At only 33 years of age, Swift has slain her Goliath and is appropriately recognized as a juggernaut in the music industry. She is well deserving of the successes she has achieved. Yet, Swift’s influence goes far beyond her music, and she has been a catalyst in reworking the fabric of an entire industry including the rise of indie groups not beholden to record companies. What will be next?
Michael Stewart is a founding member of Fishman Stewart. He has worked in a wide range of technical areas including information technology, e-commerce, telecommunications, and mechanical, aerospace, computer, and nuclear engineering. His practice includes domestic and foreign patent prosecution, e-commerce and information technology, patent opinions, intellectual property litigation, domestic and foreign trademark prosecution, trademark opinions, copyrights, trade secrets, rights of publicity, intellectual property evaluations/due diligence and drafting and negotiating technology and intellectual property agreements. Check out his full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®