Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 23
Share on Social
Remaking Friday the 13th
By Kristyn Webb
Happy Friday the 13th! You may recall our last article on this theme was authored by Norm Freda. Here is a brief recap before we update you on the latest in the legal battle over the copyrights to the classic horror film Friday the 13th.
Back in 1979, Victor Miller was hired to write a screenplay that would later become the Friday the 13th movie released in 1980. He was paid around $9,200 and the film went on to make $40 million at the box office and spawned nearly a dozen sequels, several video games, a television series, along with music and merchandise. Fast forward to 2016, Miller sought to reclaim his ownership in the copyright of the screenplay. Under United States copyright law, an author of a work may terminate an assignment or license of a copyright decades after the assignment or license was made. This allows an author to “claw back” their copyrights—which happens more often when a work becomes commercially valuable. For example, Disney’s Marvel franchise has been fighting legal battles with the estates of the artists who created characters such as Spider Man, Doctor Strange, Thor, Black Widow, and Iron Man. However, when an employee creates a work within the scope of their employment, the work is “made for hire” and the employer is considered the author of a work.
After years of litigation and appeals, Miller won back his copyrights. He was not an employee, so, Miller retained his status as the screenplay’s author. Though he had assigned his rights to his employer in 1979, as the author, he was entitled many decades later to terminate that assignment and reclaim his copyrights in the screenplay.
Now, the producer of the 1980 film, Sean Cunningham, has announced plans to move forward with another story in the Friday the 13th universe. Many of the elements recurring in the sequels and derivatives that followed the 1980 film incorporated protected elements of Miller’s screenplay. Procuring rights from Miller to make further sequels or spin-offs may be expensive, or even impossible. So, Cunningham has announced plans to shift course and make a prequel. This strategy may help him navigate around the copyrighted elements owned by Miller, without sacrificing too much of the established storyline or creating narrative plot holes that might riddle a sequel or equal story.
The prequel, called “Crystal Lake” is set to be a television series to be released in 2024. For fans of the franchise, this is long overdue, since the last film was released in 2009. For copyright fans, this is another plot twist in the ongoing saga of Friday the 13th.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and is currently earning a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law at King’s College London.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®