Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 21
Share on Social

Queen of Christmas Sued for Copyright Infringement – Again
By Kristyn Webb
In the US, we’ve just wrapped up Halloween and are preparing for Thanksgiving. Yet, we are already seeing Christmas decorations going up and holiday music is filling the airwaves—and copyright lawsuits are filling the dockets!
Earlier this month, Mariah Carey was named in a lawsuit in federal district court for copyright infringement. The plaintiffs, musicians Andy Stone (stage name “Vince Vance”) and Troy Powers, allege that the so-called “Queen of Christmas” used their country music song “All I want for Christmas is You” as the basis for her hit pop song with the same title. Stone and Powers claim that the lyrical similarities between the two songs are more than a coincidence. Both songs reference “sleighbells in the snow,” the narrator needing “just one thing,” that “Santa can’t bring,” and general disillusionment with material gifts. Both songs use the same chord progressions, including the most “Christmassy” chord (according to musicologists) which is the diminished C-6.
The country music version debuted in 1989 and became a hit in 1993. The pop version has been a seasonal staple since 1994 when it was written and released. Both versions have been widely celebrated. The country version rendition performed by Vince Vance & the Valiants made it onto Billboard’s Hot Country chart several times. Carey’s pop renditions have topped charts worldwide and have earned “Diamond” status. In 2017, it was estimated that Carey’s song had earned over $60 million USD since its release. Not bad for a song she claims to have written in 15 minutes when she was only 24 years old.
Stone filed a similar lawsuit in 2022, but dropped it early on. Both the 2022 lawsuit and the 2023 lawsuit alleged $20 million USD in damages. We will have to wait and see whether the Queen of Christmas has to pay up in high notes of legal tender, or if this lawsuit is dropped like the last one and she has a *Claus* for celebration.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and is currently earning a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law at King’s College London.

Published November 17, 2023
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In February, Nike and Skims announced that they will be working together on a new brand, NikeSkims. The co-brand will create a new line of training apparel, footwear, and accessories specifically designed to meet the unique needs of women athletes.
Generally, federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over copyright cases, and often, this presents an insurmountable paywall for individual artists and small businesses to vindicate their rights, especially where the value of the individual copyrighted works are relatively low.
Dedicated to raising public awareness about the importance of encouraging innovation and creativity throughout the world, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) annually observes World Intellectual Property Day on April 26 to showcase the role that patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyrights and trade secrets play in our everyday lives.
Hold onto your foam fingers, sports fans – college sports just got a whole lot more interesting! The latest updates to Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules are making student-athletes bigger than ever, and it’s not just about the game anymore.
Did a federal court in Louisiana recently decide that US copyrights are global rights? It seems so.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
