Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 21
Share on Social
Patenting Palate-Pleasers: Culinary Creations from Patents
By Paul M. Ratzmann
In the realm of culinary creativity, where flavors and techniques continually evolve, patenting food and food products holds a crucial place at the table. It serves as a foundation in the world of culinary invention, offering a means to safeguard and promote unique creations. This practice isn’t merely about protecting recipes and methods; it’s about nurturing creativity and ensuring that inventive minds can thrive in the competitive arena of the food industry.
Now, let’s explore the intriguing history of patenting food products and processes in the United States, with a focus on specific patents that have left their mark on the culinary world.
In 1926, E. Mandelbaum was granted US Patent USP 1600191, introducing an innovative roll that transformed the way we enjoy sandwiches. This edible roll was uniquely shaped to form a receptacle for enclosing a frankfurter, sausage, or other edible material, creating a distinctive sandwich experience.
The year 1931 witnessed another culinary revolution with C. Doering’s US Patent USP 1797856. This groundbreaking invention transformed the production of baked loaves, such as bread and cake. Each slice now contained a slice of meat, cheese, fish, or another substance, resulting in individual sandwich loaves with sterilized fillings.
Moving forward to 1940, Harry Lewis’s US Patent USP 2217282 introduced the use of redwood smoke for smoking meat. This innovative approach enhanced flavor while minimizing color formation and molding, opening up new possibilities for preserving and flavoring meat.
In 1966, Harland Sanders (yes, THE Colonel Sanders) secured US Patent USP 3245800, a culinary masterpiece that changed the fried chicken game. His patented method involved coating raw chicken pieces, immersing them in liquified cooking fat, and rapidly reducing the temperature, resulting in the iconic and flavorful fried chicken.
By 1972, Donald F. Allen’s US Patent USP 3656968 introduced a novel process for preparing sandwiches. This method involved a unique approach to creating a filling in a thin-walled bun, ensuring that flavoring materials were in direct contact with the filling, elevating the overall taste experience.
In 1977, William H. Burkhart’s US Patent USP 4048473 brought a cylindrical food cooking machine with liquid impervious walls and temperature control to the culinary world. This invention offered an innovative approach to cooking various foods, enhancing efficiency and quality.
The early 1980s saw Gene and Flora Giordano’s US Patent USP 4283431, which introduced a method for creating a multi-layer pizza-type product. This innovation expanded the possibilities for pizza enthusiasts, adding layers to traditional pizza.
By 1985, Karl Schmidt and Eugene Luoma secured US Patent USP 4551337, revolutionizing pizza creation. Their patented method involved forming perforations in a pizza dough sheet, frying it, and then topping it with sauce and other ingredients, resulting in a unique and flavorful pizza experience.
The 1990s brought further innovations, as Fabrizio Bottero’s US Patent USP 5114724 showcased multi-colored pasta pieces with striking patterns, adding visual appeal to pasta dishes.
These selected patents exemplify the diverse and ever-evolving world of culinary invention. They reflect the creative spirit of their inventors and highlight the role of intellectual property protection in shaping the culinary landscape.
Paul Ratzmann is a partner at Fishman Stewart and a registered patent attorney, practicing in many technology fields. As an engineer, before he became a patent attorney, Paul was an inventor and is listed on eleven US patents, such as the one listed here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
L.A.B. Golf aims to protect its innovations, and therefore its market position, owning three patents for its zero-torque design. The question now is whether L.A.B. Golf can withstand the wave of copycat designs.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
Our latest article tackles three common trademark questions: 1. Can I trademark my own name? 2. Can I trademark the name of a fictional character? 3. Can I trademark the name of a U.S. president or British royal?
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
Like the titles of single creative works, character names do not generate trademark rights unless used for a series of creative works (meaning two or more). A year ago, Jane Wick, LLC filed a trademark application for the mark JANE WICK in logo format.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
We know that as of June 4, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had issued more than twelve million patents. We also know that more than 10,000 patents were in existence before the count began.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
In the age of the internet, memes are a universal language. A meme is a piece of content, typically an image, video, text, or a combination of these, that spreads rapidly across the internet, often with humorous, relatable, or satirical undertones.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
