Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 25, Issue 24
Share on Social
Nothing Says Christmas Like a Copyright Lawsuit
By Kristyn Webb
Nothing warms the holiday spirit quite like a copyright lawsuit over a light-up reindeer. Back in 2019, two companies went head-to-head over just that when Enchant sued Glowco for copyright infringement.
Enchant creates large-scale holiday light displays. Glowco did the same thing. When an employee left Enchant to work at Glowco, he took Enchant’s designs with him along with contacts that manufactured the light up displays for Enchant and Enchant’s market research of ideal locations. Glowco used those designs and contacts to manufacture its own light display, which it planned to set up in Nashville, Tennessee.
Enchant sued for copyright infringement and sought a preliminary injunction to shut down Glowco’s event before the holiday season.
The district court said no, and the Sixth Circuit affirmed. Enchant had not shown a likelihood of success on its copyright claim. Enchant’s designs depicted bears, deer, and other wildlife. When the subject matter comes straight from nature, the resulting work receives only “thin” copyright protection. Enchant needed to show that Glowco copied original expressive choices rather than the unprotectable idea of illuminated animal figures. Glowco’s lighted sculptures were just different enough from Enchant’s designs. The similarities between the two sets of designs were common animal shapes and typical holiday design choices, which were not protected under copyright law.
In the end, Glowco’s holiday show went forward. Holiday lights cheered the crowds, and holiday litigation delighted the copyright lawyers.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group and holds a master’s degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
