Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 25, Issue 24
Share on Social
Nothing Says Christmas Like a Copyright Lawsuit
By Kristyn Webb
Nothing warms the holiday spirit quite like a copyright lawsuit over a light-up reindeer. Back in 2019, two companies went head-to-head over just that when Enchant sued Glowco for copyright infringement.
Enchant creates large-scale holiday light displays. Glowco did the same thing. When an employee left Enchant to work at Glowco, he took Enchant’s designs with him along with contacts that manufactured the light up displays for Enchant and Enchant’s market research of ideal locations. Glowco used those designs and contacts to manufacture its own light display, which it planned to set up in Nashville, Tennessee.
Enchant sued for copyright infringement and sought a preliminary injunction to shut down Glowco’s event before the holiday season.
The district court said no, and the Sixth Circuit affirmed. Enchant had not shown a likelihood of success on its copyright claim. Enchant’s designs depicted bears, deer, and other wildlife. When the subject matter comes straight from nature, the resulting work receives only “thin” copyright protection. Enchant needed to show that Glowco copied original expressive choices rather than the unprotectable idea of illuminated animal figures. Glowco’s lighted sculptures were just different enough from Enchant’s designs. The similarities between the two sets of designs were common animal shapes and typical holiday design choices, which were not protected under copyright law.
In the end, Glowco’s holiday show went forward. Holiday lights cheered the crowds, and holiday litigation delighted the copyright lawyers.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group and holds a master’s degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Women’s sports are having a moment, and not a small one. And right alongside that rise: the business of women’s sports is heating up, including some surprisingly dramatic trademark battles.
The idea that someone might “own” a piece of DNA raises a slightly uncomfortable question: can you really patent something that exists inside all of us?
Forbes reported that more than 1.5 million bots on an AI agent-driven social network appear to have created a new religion for themselves, the Church of Molt, with congregants adopting the name of “Crustafarians.”
Every March, college basketball players get an opportunity to become household sensations overnight. In today’s NIL (Name Image Likeness) era, that moment can be a once-in-a-lifetime business opportunity.
Behind the shamrocks and celebrations of St. Patrick's Day lies a surprisingly rich intersection with intellectual property.
Last week, PEI Licensing, LLC., the owner of the ORIGINAL PENGUIN brand (also known simply as PENGUIN) sued Pudgy Penguins Inc. in federal court in Florida over their respective penguin trademarks.
Matthew McConaughey recently obtained several trademark registrations with the U.S. Trademark Office in an effort to digitally capture and protect his entire persona.
Patents enable others to learn from, build upon, and improve the disclosed invention effectively. However, some have questioned whether they still work in today’s artificial intelligence (AI) landscape.
As athletes chase Olympic glory, the International Olympic Committee (“IOC”) is fighting a different battle, one over public perception and trademark law.
Golf is entering a data driven era, and the 2026 PGA Show showed that the most important IP in the game is shifting.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
