Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 24, Issue 4
Share on Social
Intellectual Property’s Role in Shaping the Super Bowl Experience
By Kameron F. Bonner
This year’s Super Bowl featured a thrilling overtime victory for the Kansas City Chiefs over the San Francisco 49ers. With estimates as high as 123 million viewers, America’s premier sporting event also serves as a grand stage for creativity and intellectual property (“IP”) protections that enhance the game’s success.
From the iconic logos and trademarks of the NFL and its teams, including the Chiefs’ arrowhead logo and the 49ers’ “SF” oval helmet logo, to the highly anticipated halftime show performances and commercials, the Super Bowl underscores the vital role that trademarks, copyrights, and patents play in the commercial and creative aspects of this annual event.
Trademark law is at the forefront of IP considerations during the Super Bowl. The NFL vigorously protects its trademarks, including the terms “Super Bowl” dating as far back as 1969 and “Super Sunday“, to maintain the exclusivity and value of its brand.
The NFL’s enforcement extends to preventing unauthorized businesses from using the NFL’s trademarks in promotions or on merchandise, a practice known as “ambush marketing.” A vigilant enforcement strategy against ambush marketing helps ensure that only official sponsors and partners can associate their products or services with the big event, much to the delight of paid advertisers whose 30-second commercial slots cost upwards of $7 million.
Copyright law also plays a significant role, particularly in the halftime show and the broadcast of the game itself. The performances during the halftime show, featuring some of the world’s biggest music stars including Usher, Alicia Keys, Ludacris, Lil Jon, Will.i.am, Jermaine Dupri, and H.E.R. this year, are subject to copyright protection. Additionally, the broadcast rights for the Super Bowl are a major aspect of copyright, with networks paying substantial fees for the exclusive right to air the game, which not only includes the live broadcast but also extends to replays, highlights, and other forms of media distribution.
Patents, however, are an often-overlooked aspect of the Super Bowl, encompassing everything from broadcasting technology to equipment and apparel. The event is a showcase for cutting-edge technologies, including advanced camera systems for broadcasting and immersive virtual reality experiences to enhance viewer and fan engagement.
The introduction of the 1st & Ten line system, a patented technology that superimposes a bright yellow line on the field to visually display the first-down line on the broadcast, revolutionized how fans watch football (see, e.g., US5917553A; US6100925A; US5953076A). The evolution of player tracking technologies, which use radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags to monitor real-time player stat tracking such as described in US10609762B2, has helped fuel the advancement of sports analytics and the proliferation of sports gambling such as Fantasy Football.
The interplay between IP and the Super Bowl illustrates the importance of innovation in sports and entertainment. By protecting the rights of creators, innovators, and organizations, IP law ensures that the Super Bowl remains at the forefront of technological advancement.
Kameron is a Partner at Fishman Stewart PLLC, specializing in Intellectual Property with over ten (10) years of experience counseling clients on patent, trademark, and related contractual matters. Kameron’s practice encompasses all aspects of preparing, procuring, and enforcing worldwide IP rights. Check out his full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
L.A.B. Golf aims to protect its innovations, and therefore its market position, owning three patents for its zero-torque design. The question now is whether L.A.B. Golf can withstand the wave of copycat designs.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
Our latest article tackles three common trademark questions: 1. Can I trademark my own name? 2. Can I trademark the name of a fictional character? 3. Can I trademark the name of a U.S. president or British royal?
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
Like the titles of single creative works, character names do not generate trademark rights unless used for a series of creative works (meaning two or more). A year ago, Jane Wick, LLC filed a trademark application for the mark JANE WICK in logo format.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
We know that as of June 4, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had issued more than twelve million patents. We also know that more than 10,000 patents were in existence before the count began.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
In the age of the internet, memes are a universal language. A meme is a piece of content, typically an image, video, text, or a combination of these, that spreads rapidly across the internet, often with humorous, relatable, or satirical undertones.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
