Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 24, Issue 4
Share on Social
Intellectual Property’s Role in Shaping the Super Bowl Experience
By Kameron F. Bonner
This year’s Super Bowl featured a thrilling overtime victory for the Kansas City Chiefs over the San Francisco 49ers. With estimates as high as 123 million viewers, America’s premier sporting event also serves as a grand stage for creativity and intellectual property (“IP”) protections that enhance the game’s success.
From the iconic logos and trademarks of the NFL and its teams, including the Chiefs’ arrowhead logo and the 49ers’ “SF” oval helmet logo, to the highly anticipated halftime show performances and commercials, the Super Bowl underscores the vital role that trademarks, copyrights, and patents play in the commercial and creative aspects of this annual event.
Trademark law is at the forefront of IP considerations during the Super Bowl. The NFL vigorously protects its trademarks, including the terms “Super Bowl” dating as far back as 1969 and “Super Sunday“, to maintain the exclusivity and value of its brand.
The NFL’s enforcement extends to preventing unauthorized businesses from using the NFL’s trademarks in promotions or on merchandise, a practice known as “ambush marketing.” A vigilant enforcement strategy against ambush marketing helps ensure that only official sponsors and partners can associate their products or services with the big event, much to the delight of paid advertisers whose 30-second commercial slots cost upwards of $7 million.
Copyright law also plays a significant role, particularly in the halftime show and the broadcast of the game itself. The performances during the halftime show, featuring some of the world’s biggest music stars including Usher, Alicia Keys, Ludacris, Lil Jon, Will.i.am, Jermaine Dupri, and H.E.R. this year, are subject to copyright protection. Additionally, the broadcast rights for the Super Bowl are a major aspect of copyright, with networks paying substantial fees for the exclusive right to air the game, which not only includes the live broadcast but also extends to replays, highlights, and other forms of media distribution.
Patents, however, are an often-overlooked aspect of the Super Bowl, encompassing everything from broadcasting technology to equipment and apparel. The event is a showcase for cutting-edge technologies, including advanced camera systems for broadcasting and immersive virtual reality experiences to enhance viewer and fan engagement.
The introduction of the 1st & Ten line system, a patented technology that superimposes a bright yellow line on the field to visually display the first-down line on the broadcast, revolutionized how fans watch football (see, e.g., US5917553A; US6100925A; US5953076A). The evolution of player tracking technologies, which use radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags to monitor real-time player stat tracking such as described in US10609762B2, has helped fuel the advancement of sports analytics and the proliferation of sports gambling such as Fantasy Football.
The interplay between IP and the Super Bowl illustrates the importance of innovation in sports and entertainment. By protecting the rights of creators, innovators, and organizations, IP law ensures that the Super Bowl remains at the forefront of technological advancement.
Kameron is a Partner at Fishman Stewart PLLC, specializing in Intellectual Property with over ten (10) years of experience counseling clients on patent, trademark, and related contractual matters. Kameron’s practice encompasses all aspects of preparing, procuring, and enforcing worldwide IP rights. Check out his full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
