Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 23
Share on Social
Countdown to Public Domain Day
By Kristyn Webb
This year is a big one for the public domain as it (finally) welcomes Disney’s prized IP asset: Mickey Mouse!
Well, actually, it is Mickey’s previous iteration as “Steamboat Willie.” The subsequent versions of Mickey Mouse will remain under copyright protection until their respective terms expire.
For background, Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain. Once a work enters the public domain, anyone is free to copy, publish, distribute, adapt, and otherwise use the work without infringing the rights of the former copyright owner.
In the past, Disney has successfully lobbied Congress to extend the term of copyright protection to prevent Mickey Mouse from entering the public domain. However, the current Congress does not seem similarly inclined, and Disney has not publicly made any similar efforts this time.
Notably, there is no “international copyright” and while most countries are parties to various international treaties that set certain minimum standards of protection, copyright law can vary between countries. For example, not all countries have the same duration of copyright protection. Mexico extends copyright protection for the life of the author plus 100 years. India provides copyright protection for the life of the author plus 60 years. In China, protection is for the life of the author plus 50 years. So, works that enter the public domain in one country, might still be under copyright protection in other countries.
Also, different forms of intellectual property rights may overlap, particularly for Mickey Mouse. Disney has various trademark registrations, which if properly maintained, may endure in perpetuity.
So, we will wait and see if Disney has imagined a strategy to keep control of Steamboat Willie, or whether we can expect to see him featured in a horror movie as was the case when Winnie-the-Pooh entered the public domain.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and is currently earning a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law at King’s College London.
Published December 15th, 2023
MVous Scar Cream Sparkles at the US Trademark Office!
By Kristyn Webb
MVous (pronounced “em-vee-us”—a play on words, sounding like “envious”) is a Michigan-based small business that makes and sells scar cream under the brand with the same name. MVous scar cream has a special ingredient: glitter! MVous founder, Madelyn Vyletel, created the MVous brand and products to help people feel more comfortable with scars on their bodies. After nearly losing her third child and her own life due to medical complications during pregnancy, she was left with a C-section scar on her abdomen. Rather than hide the scar, she decided to showcase it as a testament to the resilience of the human body and spirit. Fishman Stewart recently helped MVous obtain a federal trademark registration, which is helpful to small businesses in protecting their brands and combating counterfeits. Fishman Stewart is proud to represent small businesses like MVous and help them protect their valuable intellectual property. MVous scar cream is available in a variety of colors and comes in small tubes that happen to make great stocking stuffers. MVous is currently taking holiday orders and ships internationally.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
