Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 16
Share on Social
Banana Taped to Wall–Copyright Lawsuit Loses on A-peel
By Kristyn Webb
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan’s viral artwork “Comedian,” which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, “Banana and Orange.” The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Cattelan, and recently, Morford lost his appeal of that decision.
Both artworks involve a banana taped to a flat surface, but Cattelan’s piece, “Comedian,” gained widespread fame and sold for over $100,000 at Art Basel in Miami. Morford argued that Cattelan had copied his work after it was posted online and featured on social media platforms.
To succeed in a copyright infringement claim, a plaintiff must prove either direct evidence of copying or establish that the alleged infringer had access to the work and that there are “probative similarities” between the two pieces. On appeal, the court held that Morford had failed to provide sufficient evidence that Cattelan had a reasonable opportunity to access “Banana and Orange.” While Morford’s “Banana and Orange” was generally available online, the court deemed this fact alone was too speculative to establish the necessary connection between the two artists. In other words, just because it was online, did not necessarily mean that Cattelan had ever seen “Banana and Orange.”
Morford might have been able to overcome this issue if he could show “Comedian” and “Banana and Orange” contained “striking similarities,”—a standard requiring that the similarities between the works are so unique that they could not have been created independently or by mere coincidence. Despite the resemblance between the two pieces, the appellate court noted significant differences—Morford’s work features both a banana and an orange, while Cattelan’s contains only a banana.
The appellate court concluded this was enough to affirm the district court’s early dismissal of the case and decided not to weigh in on the district court’s further findings about how many ways one might tape a banana to a wall.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.


Published September 20th, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
If your inbox has been serving up dramatic “copyright infringement” cease and desist letters lately, you’re not imagining it. Scam C&Ds are having a moment.
In British and American culture, finding a penny is traditionally considered to be sign of luck - but how long until we stop finding them altogether?
If you're planning a magic show, be careful if you invoke the name of the great Houdini... you may need more than trick handcuffs to escape an infringement lawsuit.
Costumes, masks, vampires, and candy corn are symbols of Halloween. But can anyone own rights to these icons of fright and festivity?
They say she watches. That her eyes glow red at midnight. That if you sit on her lap, you’ll never rise again. She’s called Black Aggie, and she wasn’t supposed to exist.
Read about a haunting trademark co-ownership arrangement gone frighteningly wrong.
Cracker Barrel learned an important lesson with their recent logo rebranding campaign.
A Lima, OH woman turned the tables on a local car dealership after her vehicle was repossessed—by legally claiming the dealership’s name.
Trademark owners are advised to conduct searches for translations of any foreign terms in their proposed marks before selection to avoid this faux pas.
If you recently got a copyright registration certificate in the mail and noticed it’s missing something kind of important—like a signature—you’re not imagining things.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®

