Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 16
Share on Social
Banana Taped to Wall–Copyright Lawsuit Loses on A-peel
By Kristyn Webb
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan’s viral artwork “Comedian,” which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, “Banana and Orange.” The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Cattelan, and recently, Morford lost his appeal of that decision.
Both artworks involve a banana taped to a flat surface, but Cattelan’s piece, “Comedian,” gained widespread fame and sold for over $100,000 at Art Basel in Miami. Morford argued that Cattelan had copied his work after it was posted online and featured on social media platforms.
To succeed in a copyright infringement claim, a plaintiff must prove either direct evidence of copying or establish that the alleged infringer had access to the work and that there are “probative similarities” between the two pieces. On appeal, the court held that Morford had failed to provide sufficient evidence that Cattelan had a reasonable opportunity to access “Banana and Orange.” While Morford’s “Banana and Orange” was generally available online, the court deemed this fact alone was too speculative to establish the necessary connection between the two artists. In other words, just because it was online, did not necessarily mean that Cattelan had ever seen “Banana and Orange.”
Morford might have been able to overcome this issue if he could show “Comedian” and “Banana and Orange” contained “striking similarities,”—a standard requiring that the similarities between the works are so unique that they could not have been created independently or by mere coincidence. Despite the resemblance between the two pieces, the appellate court noted significant differences—Morford’s work features both a banana and an orange, while Cattelan’s contains only a banana.
The appellate court concluded this was enough to affirm the district court’s early dismissal of the case and decided not to weigh in on the district court’s further findings about how many ways one might tape a banana to a wall.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Published September 20th, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
