Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 24, Issue 7
Share on Social
Trump “Never Surrender” Sneakers: Could They Surrender To Louboutin Red Bottoms?
By Linda Monge Callaghan
President Donald Trump recently began promoting a brand-new pair of limited edition sneakers for sale bearing a T logo, American flag design, gold upper, and red sole bottom. The $399 sneakers are called the “Never Surrender High-Top” and are already sold out according to the Trump sneakers website, gettrumpsneakers.com.
The website selling the sneakers claims not to have any political affiliation, however, Trump is publicly endorsing the product, and the shoes are branded with a T logo, presumably, as an indicator of the President’s brand. A review of the U.S. Trademark Office’s online database records did not reveal any applications or registrations for a T logo reciting clothing or footwear by the President or his companies. Although trademark rights can accrue through use, registering trademarks confers significant benefits.
The lack of a trademark registration may be the least of the intellectual property concerns surrounding the new sneakers.
Surprisingly, the Never Surrender High-Tops bear a striking resemblance to these high-end fashion sneakers manufactured and sold by famous footwear designer Christian Louboutin.
Louboutin’s trademark for his “red bottoms” (red-soled high-end women’s dress shoes and footwear) is registered and arguably famous. Louboutin’s owns U.S. trademark Registration Nos. 3,361,597 and 3,376,197 for the marks below.
In the past, Louboutin has gone to great lengths and expense to enforce his rights in red soled shoes. Louboutin brought several lawsuits against infringers in the U.S., Brazil, and India over competitor’s red-soled shoes and has been successful in maintaining the red bottoms’ brand status with customers.
Some may question just how far Louboutin’s rights in a red soled shoe extend beyond women’s fashion shoes to other footwear as far as exclusivity. Louboutin challenging the Never Surrenders could toe that line.
Since the recent launch of Trump’s sneaker, social media has been in an uproar. The discourse is fraught with comments as to whether Louboutin has endorsed President Trump politically by allowing Trump to use Louboutin’s red sole trademark on the Never-Surrender High Tops. Other hot topics are whether Louboutin is going to sit back and let the former President arguably infringe on Louboutin’s trademark rights.
In Trump’s case, not only do his sneakers share a red sole with Louboutin’s, but they also have a gold upper similar to Louboutin’s sneakers giving an overall similar appearance. Thus, Louboutin may have both likelihood of confusion and dilution claims to assert against Trump due to the overall similarities between the two shoes and that the Never Surrenders would weaken and/or tarnish the distinctiveness of Louboutin’s famous trademark for his red soled shoes.
Only time will tell whether Louboutin will take any action, but one thing is certain, if a lawsuit is filed between the two highly litigious parties, red and gold sparks will fly.
Linda is a Partner at Fishman Stewart, specializing in intellectual property law. Linda focuses mainly on trademark and copyright law, including foreign and domestic prosecution and litigation, as well as agreements and assignments. Check out her full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
A White Out: Holiday Cheer for Collegiate Sports Licensing
Fish Tank: Newsletter Volume 24, Issue 29
This holiday season, many will hope it’s a white out, a classic white Christmas, as they unwrap gifts of licensed collegiate apparel. While thanking the givers of those gifts is probably the right thing to do, I’d say thank the White Out.
In 2021, artist Mason Rothschild created a series of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that depict fuzzy handbags called “MetaBirkins” which he offered for sale on the NFT marketplace OpenSea. In 2022, the French luxury brand Hermès, known for its “Birkin” handbags, filed a lawsuit for trademark infringement and other claims against Rothschild.
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®