Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 2
Share on Social
Public Service Annoucement: No. Mailing Something to Yourself is Not a Substitute for Copyright Registration or a Patent.
A common intellectual property “urban legend” is that mailing something to yourself is legally equivalent to a copyright registration or a patent. This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” or “Poor Man’s Patent” and the idea has been around for a long time.
The theory is that mailing a copy of a work or invention to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration or a patent so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service. Another variation of this theory is that documenting the work or invention and having the document notarized will grant similar legal protection.
There is no provision under U.S. law that supports these theories, and they are not a substitute for registration with the U.S. Copyright Office or obtaining a patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. A mailed or notarized copy may be evidence that a work or invention was in your possession on a certain date, but it does not prove that you hold the rights to the work or invention.
Thus, if you’re thinking about mailing something to yourself about your work or invention, whatever value might result from such a tactic may not be worth the cost of the stamp.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and is currently earning a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law at King’s College London.
Published January 25, 2023
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In February, Nike and Skims announced that they will be working together on a new brand, NikeSkims. The co-brand will create a new line of training apparel, footwear, and accessories specifically designed to meet the unique needs of women athletes.
Generally, federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over copyright cases, and often, this presents an insurmountable paywall for individual artists and small businesses to vindicate their rights, especially where the value of the individual copyrighted works are relatively low.
Dedicated to raising public awareness about the importance of encouraging innovation and creativity throughout the world, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) annually observes World Intellectual Property Day on April 26 to showcase the role that patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyrights and trade secrets play in our everyday lives.
Hold onto your foam fingers, sports fans – college sports just got a whole lot more interesting! The latest updates to Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules are making student-athletes bigger than ever, and it’s not just about the game anymore.
Did a federal court in Louisiana recently decide that US copyrights are global rights? It seems so.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
