Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 24, Issue 23
Share on Social
Pokémon v. Palworld:
Can Pokémon and Pals coexist?
By Gregory Bussell
As fans eagerly await the release of the hit video game Palworld on household consoles, those in Japan may face additional delays due to a recent lawsuit filed by Nintendo against Pocketpair, alleging infringement of a Japanese video game patent.
Palworld is a multiplayer open-world survival game developed by Pocketpair, a Japanese indie studio. The game has garnered attention for its unique combination of creature-collection mechanics—reminiscent of Nintendo’s Pokémon series—with elements of action, crafting, and survival. Players can explore a vast world, capture and befriend creatures known as “Pals,” build bases, farm, and engage in combat using both their Pals and conventional firearms.
Despite these distinctive features, Palworld has drawn comparisons to Pokémon, particularly for its creature-catching mechanics. This similarity is a key reason why the game has attracted legal scrutiny from Nintendo.
This is not the first time Nintendo or The Pokémon Company has taken legal action over intellectual property. In a similar case, The Pokémon Company successfully filed and won a lawsuit in China against entities related to the Palworld game, claiming copyright infringement and violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention Law, with a settlement of approximately $15 million.
Now, Japanese fans of Palworld may experience delays in accessing the game on household consoles following Nintendo’s most recent legal filings, as announced on the company’s website last Thursday.
Nintendo and The Pokémon Company claim that Pocketpair has infringed upon a Japanese patent, speculated to be related to Patent JP7398425B2, titled “Game program, game system, game device, and game processing method,” filed on December 22, 2021. This patent is believed to cover the mechanics of aiming in a virtual space and capturing a field character when an item is released—likely analogous to the act of throwing a Pokéball to capture a Pokémon.
Although some of these mechanics may be present in Palworld, the patent claims will likely face challenges in litigation, either on the grounds of invalidity based on prior Pokémon-related games or as a question of eligible subject matter. The outcome of this lawsuit will set a precedent for how video game patents are interpreted and enforced moving forward.
For now, Japanese fans of Palworld will have to wait and see whether the claims hold up and encompass Palworld or if they will be invalidated, potentially allowing for the game’s release without further legal barriers.
Greg is an Associate with Fishman Stewart PLLC. Intellectual property law became Gregory’s focus due to its unique blend of creativity, innovation, and legal intricacies. Protecting the rights of creators, inventors, and businesses allows him to be at the forefront of promoting progress and innovation in various industries.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®