Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 15
Share on Social
NBA Teams Sued for Copyright Infringement
By Kristyn Webb
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints, filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works such as “All I Do Is Win,” “Bottoms Up,” and “Say So”, allege that the teams used these musical works on various platforms and websites without first obtaining the proper synchronization licenses.
In the music industry, a synchronization license, or sync license, generally permits a party to use a musical work as background music in a video, thus syncing the music relative to the moving images in an audiovisual piece.
Many platforms, like TikTok, offer music libraries where the sync licenses have already been negotiated by the platform on behalf of the user. Users should note, however, that different terms and conditions may apply if the user plans to use the music in content for commercial purposes. For example, using background music in a personal rendition of a viral dance video is different from using music as part of a video to advertise dance lessons.
For now, the lawsuits are in early stages. Perhaps the NBA teams will show a strong defense if they can prove their use was licensed on the various platforms via the terms of service. Otherwise, the court may call a foul on the unlicensed use.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Published August 23th, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
