Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 22, Issue 6
Share on Social
Scamwatch: “Money, Honey”
Is it just me or is everyone on scam-overload? From “phishing” emails announcing “prizes” that are malware, to “contractors” who, after taking your “deposit,” never show up.
The latest scams are coronavirus-related and they are rampant. As of January 29th of this year, the Federal Trade Commission had logged more than 676,000 consumer complaints related to COVID-19 since January 2020, nearly three-quarters of which involved fraud, such as the sale of fake at-home rapid tests, or charging for tests that are otherwise administered for free.
No surprise, then, that a recent FBI report shows that the Justice Department is seriously failing to combat internet fraud. The FBI annual report on Internet Crime for 2020, says that the Department’s Internet Crime Complaint Center received a record number, 791,790, with reported losses exceeding $4.1 billion. This represents a 69% increase over total complaints submitted in 2019.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) has not been immune from scamming. We recommend that owners of trademark applications or registrations check out the “SCAM ALERT” webpage, HERE. Basically, trademark scammers will extract publicly available data, such as trademark applicants’ and registrants’ names, phone numbers and addresses, and then mail, email, or text trademark-related solicitations to applicants and registrants that appear to be from the PTO.
For example, a solicitation may be a notice of an upcoming filing deadline with an offer of services to respond to the deadline, usually requiring a fee. While these solicitations may often contain correct information (for example, that a filing is due to keep a registration active), you are never required to use the services offered by these companies, and indeed, some are actual scams offering unneeded services or requesting the payment of fees that are not due.
At least the PTO is cracking down. In March 2017, the fraudster company “Trademark Compliance Center” was convicted of money laundering involving a trademark renewal scam. Similarly in 2021, a federal court in South Carolina sentenced the scammer behind the entities “Patent and Trademark Office” and “Patent and Trademark Bureau” on four counts of federal mail fraud for creating a false association with the PTO and deceiving trademark owners into paying expensive fees.
How can I tell the difference between potentially misleading trademark offers and notices and legitimate PTO emails and notices?
Per uspto.gov, all official correspondence about your trademark application or registration will be from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, Virginia, and all emails will be from the domain “@uspto.gov.”
Further, and no surprise, the scammers send the fraudulent letters directly to the parties, not their attorneys. When a party is represented by counsel, the PTO only communicates with counsel. Thus, if you are represented by counsel, anything you directly receive that appears to be from the PTO, is likely to be a scam.
As with all facets of online life, it pays to be vigilant.
Published March 25, 2022
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” and the idea has been around for a long time. The theory is that mailing a copy of a work to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service.
Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain.
Unlike the Matrix, Star Wars, and Austin Powers, respectively, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, or ChatGPT, is not a robot in disguise or a bot of science fiction. We, the users, provide prompts in text form, and ChatGPT converses in response to the prompts.
Recently, we filed an application to register the copyright for Finny the Fish. In the United States, and in many other countries, copyright protection arises at the moment a work is fixed in tangible medium. So, why would we take the extra step to register Finny’s copyright?
With the 2022 midterms (almost) in the rearview mirror, political junkies are now free to turn their full attention to the 2024 presidential election. Today’s focus is on the tug of war that can occur when candidates play music at campaign events.
Both trademark law and copyright law may protect your logo, although the protection they provide differs. Trademark law would prohibit the unauthorized use of another’s logo that is sufficiently similar to your logo such that it is likely to cause confusion in the marketplace.
In the U.S., copyright protection generally does not extend to “useful” articles, like shoes, but can protect the designs on shoes, like that of the Yeezy Boost 350 sneakers. However, in Italy, the global fashion powerhouse since the 15th century, copyright law can protect shoes—like Moon Boots.
Under US copyright law, in most instances, if an independent designer creates your logo, then the independent designer, not you as the contracting party, would own the copyright.
Humans have been making and using musical instruments since at least the Paleolithic age—long before patent systems were put into place to protect inventions.
A trademark lawsuit brought by Vans against MSCHF, a Brooklyn-based art collective behind musician/artist Tyga’s “Wavy Baby” sneaker design.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
