Fishman Stewart PLLC | 800 Tower Drive | Suite 610 | Troy, MI 48098 | USA +1 248.594.0600

Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 24, Issue 22

Share on Social

ATLIENS vs. ATLiens, Let Me Hear You Say “O-Nay-Yer”

By Michelle L. Visser

In 1994, a little-known hip hop band from Atlanta named Outkast released its debut album Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik. The album achieved some success, but the band’s second album, ATLiens, put the band on the map. Outkast’s ATLiens album (which contained a song by the same name) has enjoyed enduring critical and commercial success.

ATLiens Touring, Inc., also from Atlanta, is an electronic dance music (EDM) duo that has been performing under the name ATLiens since 2012. In 2020, ATLiens Touring obtained a trademark registration for the mark ATLiens for entertainment services. 

Outkast’s holding company, High Schoolers, LLC, filed its own applications for ATLIENS in 2021, for a variety of music and entertainment goods and services. The applications were refused registration based on ATLiens Touring’s registration, and Outkast petitioned to cancel the registration.

Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages. Outkast asserts that it coined the term “ATLiens” as a portmanteau of “ATL” and “aliens,” and that it has prior rights in ATLIENS based on its 1996 album and song, followed by new versions and remixes of the ATLiens song, as well as associated merchandise.

Under trademark law, the title of a single creative work such as a book, song or movie, does not function as a trademark, but rather, merely serves only as the work’s name and does not identify its source. Source identification is the function of a trademark. 

When a designation such as a title or character is used for a series of creative works (meaning two or more), trademark rights can accrue.  Under certain circumstances, an original work and subsequent versions of the work can constitute a series, if the original and subsequent versions differ significantly in content. Outkast will need to demonstrate that the original ATLiens song and the follow up versions and remixes are substantially different to qualify as a series, which may give rise to trademark rights.

Additionally, it remains to be seen whether Outkast can prove priority of rights.  It released the ATLiens album in 1996.  ATLiens Touring began use of the mark in 2012. Trademark rights in a series may date back to the original work in the series, if the subsequent works were published within a reasonable time such that it creates an association to the public between the works as a series.

We will watch this case with interest, though we think it is likely that this case will go the way of the Lady A dispute (formerly Lady Antebellum), with the parties reaching a confidential settlement.

Michelle Visser is a partner of Fishman Stewart, with over 25 years of experience practicing trademark law with other members of the firm’s Trademark Group. Check out her full bio here.

 

Related Content from Fishman Stewart

IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®