Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 24, Issue 19
Share on Social
Enough Use to Stay Airborne
In Chicago last weekend, the Chicago Air and Water Show entertained thousands of lakeshore spectators with the aerial prowess of a series of aircraft including the Blue Angels, F-35s, supersonic jets, and other airplanes.
The thunderous sound of jets overhead could be heard throughout the city for four days: practice runs Thursday and Friday, and the full show on Saturday and Sunday.
While the Chicago Air and Water Show is not a registered U.S. trademark, it has sufficient use to support registration (other criteria of course would apply).
That’s right, a single, two-day show once a year is enough use to support a trademark registration.
Sometimes.
The U.S. requires that a trademark have “use in commerce” to register. Initially to obtain registration, the volume can be quite low—even two hats sold is enough. After a mark has already registered, however, the use in commerce necessary to avoid abandonment will usually be higher. This volume of “use” needed will depend on whether it is “bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right.”
Sufficient use, then, to preserve trademark rights varies based on the products or services associated with the trademark.
Take the F-35 fighter jet as shown in the photo above from the Chicago Air and Water Show. Lockheed Martin owns a trademark registration for F-35, and it has sold about 1,000 jets since it first used the mark in 2009. In the course of the trade for military fighter jets, it is likely reasonable that even a handful sold per year could be bona fide use.
As for shows like the Chicago Air and Water Show itself, it would be bona fide for such an event to only provide its entertainment services once a year—that is ordinary to its course of trade. Music festivals, film award shows, and other similar events would have similar use frequency be considered sufficient.
Trademarks for more “ordinary” products and services would likely require more volume of use to maintain trademark registrations. For example, a registration for the mark CS for stereo amplifiers was cancelled for abandonment after its sales fell to single digit units per year for a stretch of five years.
As the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals once said, the trademark laws are not intended “to provide a warehouse for unused marks.” But what use it takes to avoid abandonment will be specific to the particular products and services.
Whether it’s a jet booming overhead, or the booming stereo system at a music festival, each trademark’s area of trade must be uniquely considered.
Alexander JSW Johnson is an attorney at Fishman Stewart with more than 10 years of extensive experience in trademark and intellectual property matters. He works in the firm’s Trademark Practice Group. He is a hobbyist photographer and took the photograph of the F-35 shown above.
Fishman Stewart’s 2024 “Super Lawyers”
- Michael D. Fishman: Intellectual Property (2006–2013; 2015–2024)
- Michael B. Stewart: Intellectual Property (2008–2024)
- John P. Guenther: Intellectual Property (2018–2024)
- Barbara L. Mandell: Intellectual Property Litigation (2016–2024)
- Michelle L. Visser: Intellectual Property (2021–2024)
Partner Kameron F. Bonner has again been named a Rising Star in Intellectual Property, his eighth time on the list (2017–2024).
Please join us in congratulating our colleagues.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In 2021, artist Mason Rothschild created a series of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that depict fuzzy handbags called “MetaBirkins” which he offered for sale on the NFT marketplace OpenSea. In 2022, the French luxury brand Hermès, known for its “Birkin” handbags, filed a lawsuit for trademark infringement and other claims against Rothschild.
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®