Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 7
Share on Social

Easter Eggs and Copyright Traps
By Kristyn Webb
For many of us, the term “Easter egg” conjures up memories of dying hard-boiled eggs in bright colors or hunting for treasures and candies stuffed inside plastic orbs hidden around the neighborhood. But for video gamers, the term “Easter egg” means a secret feature or message hidden inside a video game.
In the video game context, the term was coined in the 1980’s, around the time that Atari released its Adventure video game. During those years, Atari kept numerous programmers on its payroll but did not give the individual programmers any type of recognition. In the US, creative works, such as video game software, made by employees within the scope of their employment are “made for hire” and the copyrights to those works are owned by the employer, not the employee. So, while Atari owned the copyright to Adventure, its failure to provide any attribution or public recognition of the individual programmers was not always received well by those programmers.
One such programmer, Warren Robinett, decided to do something about that. He put in a bit of code that created a secret room within the game. If a player successfully executed a series of tasks, a hidden message was revealed that stated, “Created by Warren Robinett.” Robinett told no one and the secret code was not discovered in prerelease testing. It was only after the video game was released and a thousand copies were shipped around the world, that fifteen-year-old Adam Clayton discovered the secret message and wrote a letter to Atari.
Once word got out, it spread around the gaming community and school playgrounds like wildfire. Atari decided it would be too costly to try to recall and fix the code. Instead, it leaned into the phenomena, called the message an “Easter egg” and promised to put more such hidden treasures in future games.
Beyond corporate rebellion or attribution, the use of Easter eggs in software can have other effects. In fact, for ages, mapmakers have been incorporating such hidden treasures, called “phantom settlements” or “paper towns.” These are cities, streets, and other features that appear on maps, but do not exist in real life. You may have had the frustrating experience of following your GPS toward a shortcut that does not actually exist. These features, sometimes called “copyright traps” help identify unauthorized copies of the maps.
So, next time you find what appears to be a secret message in a video game, or end up hopelessly lost trying to find a street or destination that doesn’t exist, you’ll know why!
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and is currently earning a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law at King’s College London.

Published April 7, 2023
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In February, Nike and Skims announced that they will be working together on a new brand, NikeSkims. The co-brand will create a new line of training apparel, footwear, and accessories specifically designed to meet the unique needs of women athletes.
Generally, federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over copyright cases, and often, this presents an insurmountable paywall for individual artists and small businesses to vindicate their rights, especially where the value of the individual copyrighted works are relatively low.
Dedicated to raising public awareness about the importance of encouraging innovation and creativity throughout the world, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) annually observes World Intellectual Property Day on April 26 to showcase the role that patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyrights and trade secrets play in our everyday lives.
Hold onto your foam fingers, sports fans – college sports just got a whole lot more interesting! The latest updates to Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules are making student-athletes bigger than ever, and it’s not just about the game anymore.
Did a federal court in Louisiana recently decide that US copyrights are global rights? It seems so.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
