Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 4
Share on Social
AI Stands for … Art Infringers?
By Alexander JSW Johnson
Artificial Intelligence tools have been all the rage in recent months. From ChatGPT to Midjourney, these tools take different forms but the premise is the same: a user enters a prompt in text form, and the AI tool creates a response in text-form or image. They do so by learning from existing writings and images and then composing a piece based on all those reference points. They can even write or render in the particular style of a person, genre, period, or other style-defining category.
Last month, a trio of artists filed a class action suit against three AI tool-makers: Stability AI Ltd. (and Stability AI), Inc., Midjourney, Inc., and DeviantArt, Inc. The thrust: these tools create works (text or images) taking the style of or sourcing from copyrighted works without permission.
I’m not here to weigh in on this suit (particularly the class certification angle), but, I do find it interesting and noteworthy that in my undergrad art studies, instructors often encouraged studying the classics and practicing replication of specific pieces down to every detail imaginable as a means of developing skill—but the works I trained on were always public domain pieces. The pieces that these AI tools have drawn on for training their skills and creating their pieces are, at least in some instances, not public domain.
This case draws out some interesting issues for AI-generated artwork. First, do these AI art bots “copy” works such that it is copyright infringement, or is it fair use as inspirational source material? Second, regardless of infringement and fair use, are the works of these AI tools copyrightable works themselves?
Last month I asked for your take on who owns the copyright in user-prompted, AI-generated text. After considering the issue for a different medium—visual works—I’m curious what your view is now.
Who owns the copyright in works generated by AI tools?
Published February 23, 2023
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
In the digital age, social media has become a powerful platform for content creation, enabling individuals and businesses to reach wide audiences. Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube have made it easy for anyone with a smartphone and an internet connection to create and share content.
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a jury verdict holding that the use of the "Success Kid" meme by a congressman's reelection campaign for fundraising purposes did not qualify as fair use.
In February 2024, proposed legislation was introduced in US House of Representatives which would extend copyright protection to golf courses. The bill is titled “Bolstering Intellectual Rights against Digital Infringement Enhancement Act” or the “BIRDIE Act”.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
