Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 22, Issue 19
Share on Social
Will “The Real USFL” Please Stand Up?
By Norman K. Freda
After a 37-year absence, the United States Football League (“USFL”) returned this year for another season!… Or did it?
The USFL was a springtime professional American football league that kicked off its first season in 1983 and featured some all-time great football players, such as Jim Kelly, Herschel Walker, and Reggie White. After three successful seasons, the USFL moved its season to the fall and directly competed with the National Football League (NFL). This move turned out to be the downfall of the USFL, and ultimately, led to its merger with the NFL in 1986.
Fast forward a few decades to June 2021 when Fox Sports “relaunched” the “new USFL” as a brand-new football league that is completely unrelated to the USFL that existed from 1983-1986 (“original USFL”)—that is, apart from its name and appearance. The new USFL is using the same league name and team names as the original USFL, as well as redesigned/updated variations of the original USFL’s league and team logos.
The former USFL team owners were less than thrilled at the prospect of a “relaunch” that did not include them. So, they formed a corporation called “The Real USFL” and sued Fox Sports for trademark infringement, false advertising, and false association, among other things.
Back in its heyday, the original USFL had registered approximately 400 trademarks for the league name, league logo, team names, and team logos. However, by 1992 all of the original USFL’s registered trademarks had lapsed. Leading up to the “relaunch,” Fox Sports began filing trademark applications for many of the original USFL’s old trademarks, including “USFL” and numerous team names and logos. After all, if nobody else was using them, why not?
The Real USFL filed suit and moved for a preliminary injunction to stop Fox Sports’ use of the disputed trademarks. The motion was denied largely because of Fox Sports’ significant financial investment in the new USFL and The Real USFL’s minimal use of the disputed trademarks.
The Real USFL may not have made it into the endzone on this drive, but it won the game because the court ultimately concluded that The Real USFL was likely to win on the merits of its trademark infringement claim.
The court reasoned that even though the original trademark registrations had all expired by 1992, the actions of The Real USFL (e.g., consulting on media projects, managing royalties from apparel sales, etc.) showed an intent to keep using the disputed trademarks, and thus, The Real USFL had a protectable interest in the trademarks. The court also concluded that there was a likelihood of consumer confusion, noting that Fox Sports had adopted the disputed trademarks to “capitalize on the nostalgia for the [original USFL].”
Considering the court’s position that Fox Sports was unlikely to win the case in the end, it is unsurprising that the parties decided to settle at the end of August 2022. The lawsuit has been dismissed, and Fox Sports confirmed that the new USFL will be returning in 2023 for a second season.
While this is surely welcome news to football fans, the settlement of this case does little to reduce lingering consumer confusion between the original USFL and the new USFL. Yet, it serves as a cautionary tale that a lapsed federal trademark registration does not necessarily mean that all rights to a trademark are abandoned and free for the taking.
Under U.S. trademark law, there is a presumption that a trademark has been abandoned if its owner stops using the trademark for three consecutive years. This presumption can be rebutted with evidence of use or intent to resume use of the trademark, including licensing of the trademark. If you would like advice on how to properly maintain your trademark, or want to talk sports, please feel free to contact us.
Norman K. Freda is an attorney at Fishman Stewart and practices in the fields of patent, trademark, copyright law, and litigation. He holds a BS degree in Applied Engineering Sciences from Michigan State University. Check out his bio.
Published September 23, 2022
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
The US Copyright Office recently made headlines for partially revoking a copyright registration it previously issued for an AI-generated graphic novel. Artist Kristina Kashtanova used the Midjourney platform to create images that she included in her graphic novel called Zarya of the Dawn.
Ed Sheeran recently successfully defended against a copyright infringement lawsuit over his 2014 hit “Thinking Out Loud.” Songwriter Ed Townsend’s heirs brought the suit alleging Sheeran had infringed Townsend’s copyrights in the 1973 Motown classic, “Let’s Get It On” which Townsend co-authored with Marvin Gaye.
American publishing houses consistently snapped up the works of the famous British author, re-published them in cheap editions, which sold all over the country, and they pocketed the proceeds without any remuneration to Charles Dickens.
For many of us, the term “Easter egg” conjures up memories of dying hard-boiled eggs in bright colors or hunting for treasures and candies stuffed inside plastic orbs hidden around the neighborhood.
Each of us is creative. The key is to leverage that creativity, converting it into an intellectual property asset that enhances enterprise value.
This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” and the idea has been around for a long time. The theory is that mailing a copy of a work to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service.
Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain.
Unlike the Matrix, Star Wars, and Austin Powers, respectively, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, or ChatGPT, is not a robot in disguise or a bot of science fiction. We, the users, provide prompts in text form, and ChatGPT converses in response to the prompts.
Recently, we filed an application to register the copyright for Finny the Fish. In the United States, and in many other countries, copyright protection arises at the moment a work is fixed in tangible medium. So, why would we take the extra step to register Finny’s copyright?
With the 2022 midterms (almost) in the rearview mirror, political junkies are now free to turn their full attention to the 2024 presidential election. Today’s focus is on the tug of war that can occur when candidates play music at campaign events.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
