Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 18
Share on Social
Who Ya Gonna Call? Ghostbusters Win Infringement Lawsuit
By Kristyn Webb
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are getting into the spirit with another spooky copyright story.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984. One of the most recognized features of the “Ghostbusters” franchise is the iconic ghost logo. Shortly after the film’s release, Harvey Cartoons, the makers of “Casper the Friendly Ghost” sued Columbia Pictures for copyright and trademark infringement, claiming the “Ghostbusters” logo was a spectral copy of Harvey’s ghostly character “Fatso.”
“Fatso” first appeared in a series of “Casper” comic books published in the early 1950’s by Paramount Pictures. At that time, under US copyright law, registrations had to be renewed, or the copyrighted works would fall into the public domain. The law was changed in 1976, well before the lawsuit was filed, but well after “Fatso” had lapsed into the public domain. Thus, Columbia’s “Ghostbusters” logo was clear of copyright issues since any similarities were with a character no longer protected under copyright.
Harvey also claimed that Columbia’s logo was too similar to its registered trademark, which could confuse consumers. Harvey’s trademark depicted three ghost heads, while Columbia’s logo featured a single ghost with a different design. The court found there was no significant chance that moviegoers would expect to see a “Casper” cartoon when purchasing tickets to see the “Ghostbusters” film.
The court gave Columbia’s “Ghostbusters” logo a clean bill of health, ruling it didn’t infringe on Harvey’s copyright or trademark rights.
Watching ghosts battle it out in court is always entertaining!
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Published October 18th, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
In the age of the internet, memes are a universal language. A meme is a piece of content, typically an image, video, text, or a combination of these, that spreads rapidly across the internet, often with humorous, relatable, or satirical undertones.
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
