Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 14
Share on Social
Trumpamania Trademark Filings Get Ready to Rumble
By Kristyn Webb
While the next presidential election in the US remains a way off, November 5, 2024, campaign season is in full swing. As part of the election process, the participating political parties each hold their own convention to elect the party’s candidate.
The 2024 Republican National Convention, where Donald Trump was officially named as the candidate for the Republican Party, was held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, just a few days after a fatal shooting took place at a Trump Campaign Rally in Pennsylvania. The Convention spanned several days and was a star-studded event.
Former wrestling star Hulk Hogan was among the celebrities in attendance who spoke in support of Trump. On the last day of the convention, July 18, 2024, Hogan delivered an impassioned speech featuring the term “Trumpamania”—-a play on the term “WrestleMania,” the annual wrestling event where Hogan was a long-time reigning champion.
On July 20, 2024, Hogan Holdings, LLC filed a trademark application with the US Patent and Trademark Office for TRUMPAMANIA for various clothing items. However, it appears that Hogan was beat to the punch by Latino Gang LLC, which had already filed two applications on July 19, 2024, for the same term for various clothing items and for bedding and banners. All of the applications were filed on an intent-to-use basis, meaning that the filing date may determine who has the rights to the mark. There is no indication yet how any of these applications may be taken by Trump or the WWE, the wrestling organization that holds various registrations for WRESTLEMANIA—-including one for clothing.
It is starting to look like this may be a trail-blazin’, eyebrow raisin’ battle.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Published August 9th, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Women’s sports are having a moment, and not a small one. And right alongside that rise: the business of women’s sports is heating up, including some surprisingly dramatic trademark battles.
The idea that someone might “own” a piece of DNA raises a slightly uncomfortable question: can you really patent something that exists inside all of us?
Forbes reported that more than 1.5 million bots on an AI agent-driven social network appear to have created a new religion for themselves, the Church of Molt, with congregants adopting the name of “Crustafarians.”
Every March, college basketball players get an opportunity to become household sensations overnight. In today’s NIL (Name Image Likeness) era, that moment can be a once-in-a-lifetime business opportunity.
Behind the shamrocks and celebrations of St. Patrick's Day lies a surprisingly rich intersection with intellectual property.
Last week, PEI Licensing, LLC., the owner of the ORIGINAL PENGUIN brand (also known simply as PENGUIN) sued Pudgy Penguins Inc. in federal court in Florida over their respective penguin trademarks.
Matthew McConaughey recently obtained several trademark registrations with the U.S. Trademark Office in an effort to digitally capture and protect his entire persona.
Patents enable others to learn from, build upon, and improve the disclosed invention effectively. However, some have questioned whether they still work in today’s artificial intelligence (AI) landscape.
As athletes chase Olympic glory, the International Olympic Committee (“IOC”) is fighting a different battle, one over public perception and trademark law.
Golf is entering a data driven era, and the 2026 PGA Show showed that the most important IP in the game is shifting.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
