Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 22, Issue 11
Share on Social
The Colorful Origins of the Pride Flag
June is Pride Month, and as the celebrations commence, it may come as a surprise to learn that one of the most iconic symbols of LGBTQ+ rights and awareness — the rainbow flag — is not registered for any intellectual property protection. There are no federal trademark or copyright registrations for the design. Instead, intellectual property rights have been used to keep the rainbow flag design free of any restrictions that might hamper the public’s free use of the design.
Despite this lack of intellectual property ownership, the flag does have an identifiable author: Gilbert Baker. Baker designed the original rainbow flag in 1978. The flag was created as a positive symbol of LGBTQ+ identity and solidarity that could serve as an alternative to the more common Pink Triangle symbol, which was a recaptured symbol of oppression. The flag made its debut at Freedom Day in San Francisco that same year. Shortly thereafter, an advocacy organization attempted to lay claim to the flag’s design as a trademark.
In response, Baker hired civil rights attorney Matt Coles to help him block the advocacy organization from filing a federal trademark application or otherwise controlling the public’s free use of the design. Baker could not afford to pay Coles, but Coles took on the case because he understood the importance of keeping the flag as a shared community symbol. Baker and Coles were successful at keeping the organization at bay with just a few demand letters. To this day, the rainbow flag design remains free for all to use.
Intellectual property rights are often used to restrict others from using the protected property. In this case, however, intellectual property rights achieved the opposite outcome. Baker’s choice to not enforce his rights, and Coles’ intervention to assist Baker in doing so, ensured that the public could use, adapt, reproduce, and display the design without fear of infringement liability. Similar outcomes to important community iconographies can also be seen in the use of the “Black Lives Matter” phrase, as was discussed in a previous Fish Bits article.
Published June 3, 2022
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” and the idea has been around for a long time. The theory is that mailing a copy of a work to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service.
Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain.
Unlike the Matrix, Star Wars, and Austin Powers, respectively, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, or ChatGPT, is not a robot in disguise or a bot of science fiction. We, the users, provide prompts in text form, and ChatGPT converses in response to the prompts.
Recently, we filed an application to register the copyright for Finny the Fish. In the United States, and in many other countries, copyright protection arises at the moment a work is fixed in tangible medium. So, why would we take the extra step to register Finny’s copyright?
With the 2022 midterms (almost) in the rearview mirror, political junkies are now free to turn their full attention to the 2024 presidential election. Today’s focus is on the tug of war that can occur when candidates play music at campaign events.
Both trademark law and copyright law may protect your logo, although the protection they provide differs. Trademark law would prohibit the unauthorized use of another’s logo that is sufficiently similar to your logo such that it is likely to cause confusion in the marketplace.
In the U.S., copyright protection generally does not extend to “useful” articles, like shoes, but can protect the designs on shoes, like that of the Yeezy Boost 350 sneakers. However, in Italy, the global fashion powerhouse since the 15th century, copyright law can protect shoes—like Moon Boots.
Under US copyright law, in most instances, if an independent designer creates your logo, then the independent designer, not you as the contracting party, would own the copyright.
Humans have been making and using musical instruments since at least the Paleolithic age—long before patent systems were put into place to protect inventions.
A trademark lawsuit brought by Vans against MSCHF, a Brooklyn-based art collective behind musician/artist Tyga’s “Wavy Baby” sneaker design.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
#/media/File:Gay_flag_8.svg){kind=link}
