Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 27
Share on Social
Taylor Swift: David versus Goliath
Taylor Swift has had an incredible 2023. Her “Eras Tour” has been a massive success, becoming one of the most profitable tours for an artist of all time. The release of the concert film of the tour became the highest-grossing concert film of all time. Swift had 10 wins at the 2023 Billboard Music Awards including top artist and top selling song for “Anti-Hero.” Swift was also named a billionaire this year by “Forbes,” the magazine noting that her net worth primarily derives from her music rather than side hustles such as beauty brands or alcohol investments. Just this week, moreover, Swift made history as “Person of the Year” according to “Time” magazine.
An additional achievement for Swift this year, however, harkens back to our “FishBits” discussing how Taylor Swift has been taking back her copyright by re-recording her earlier albums to undermine the value of her original master recordings, which had been sold to her arch enemy, Scooter Braun. Swift re-released another two albums in 2023, “Speak Now” and “1989.” Dropped a little more than a month ago on October 27, 2023, “1989” already has more than 1.65 million sales!
In response to the tremendous success of the “Taylor’s Version” re-recordings, record companies are determined to keep artists from ever doing again what Taylor Swift has accomplished. As reported by “Billboard,” major labels such as Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group have recently overhauled contracts for new signees, some demanding artists wait an unprecedented 10, 15 or even 30 years to re-record releases after departing their record companies. Nor are the labels generally willing to negotiate the new terms.
The response from independent artists may make things worse for the record companies. They are actively redefining the music industry by harnessing online marketplaces or their fan bases directly to engage financial support in an approach that mirrors venture capital investments, effectively circumventing the requirement for a record deal where the label owns everything. I am an “investor” in one such enterprise, a bluegrass band called “The Petersens.” I have happily attended concerts and purchased albums dropped by the family. I even received a holiday card with a sticker in the mail thanking me for my support!
Many Taylor Swift songs can be interpreted through the lens of the biblical David versus Goliath story. The theme of underdogs versus giants is explored in such songs as “Bad Blood,” “Mean,” “Long Live,” and “The Story of Us.” Triumph through vulnerability is expressed in “Sparks Fly,” “Blank Space,” “Delicate,” “Never Grow Up,” and “Wildest Dreams.” The reclaiming of power is the subject of such Taylor Swift songs as “End Game,” “I Did Something Bad,” “The Archer,” “Look What You Made Me Do,” and “Shake It Off.”
At only 33 years of age, Swift has slain her Goliath and is appropriately recognized as a juggernaut in the music industry. She is well deserving of the successes she has achieved. Yet, Swift’s influence goes far beyond her music, and she has been a catalyst in reworking the fabric of an entire industry including the rise of indie groups not beholden to record companies. What will be next?
Michael Stewart is a founding member of Fishman Stewart. He has worked in a wide range of technical areas including information technology, e-commerce, telecommunications, and mechanical, aerospace, computer, and nuclear engineering. His practice includes domestic and foreign patent prosecution, e-commerce and information technology, patent opinions, intellectual property litigation, domestic and foreign trademark prosecution, trademark opinions, copyrights, trade secrets, rights of publicity, intellectual property evaluations/due diligence and drafting and negotiating technology and intellectual property agreements. Check out his full bio here.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In British and American culture, finding a penny is traditionally considered to be sign of luck - but how long until we stop finding them altogether?
If you're planning a magic show, be careful if you invoke the name of the great Houdini... you may need more than trick handcuffs to escape an infringement lawsuit.
Costumes, masks, vampires, and candy corn are symbols of Halloween. But can anyone own rights to these icons of fright and festivity?
They say she watches. That her eyes glow red at midnight. That if you sit on her lap, you’ll never rise again. She’s called Black Aggie, and she wasn’t supposed to exist.
Read about a haunting trademark co-ownership arrangement gone frighteningly wrong.
Cracker Barrel learned an important lesson with their recent logo rebranding campaign.
A Lima, OH woman turned the tables on a local car dealership after her vehicle was repossessed—by legally claiming the dealership’s name.
Trademark owners are advised to conduct searches for translations of any foreign terms in their proposed marks before selection to avoid this faux pas.
If you recently got a copyright registration certificate in the mail and noticed it’s missing something kind of important—like a signature—you’re not imagining things.
Early this year, an Austrian property developer filed claims that several of the trademarks connected to the James Bond franchise have not been used as required to maintain trademark protections in these jurisdictions.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®

