Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 25, Issue 2
Share on Social
Protecting Memes: Can You Own a Viral Sensation?
In the age of the internet, memes are a universal language. A meme is a piece of content, typically an image, video, text, or a combination of these, that spreads rapidly across the internet, often with humorous, relatable, or satirical undertones. But behind the laughter lies a complex web of intellectual property (IP) questions: can memes be protected? Who owns them? And what happens when a viral sensation becomes big business?
Memes often repurpose existing material, such as movie stills, famous photographs, or viral videos. Some examples include the “Distracted Boyfriend” meme, which uses a stock photo of a man turning to look at another woman, or the “Success Kid” meme, featuring a toddler clenching his fist with a determined expression.
Legally, these original works are protected by copyright. When someone uses copyrighted works to create a meme, they’re walking a fine line between creativity and infringement.
Under the fair use doctrine, the creative material added may not infringe copyright in the work if the material adds new meaning, messages, or value. For example, fair use may apply when someone uses copyrighted works for commentary, criticism, or parody. However, if the meme is used commercially without permission, fair use protection can fade.
When Memes Meet Trademarks
Some memes incorporate logos, slogans, or brand images, raising trademark concerns. For instance, memes parodying famous brands could potentially raise legal concerns, like the dispute between Louis Vuitton and Haute Diggity Dog over parody products, though clear examples involving memes specifically remain scarce. Brand owners often protect their trademarks aggressively against association with inappropriate content. However, parody can sometimes be a defense in these cases.
The Business of Memes
Memes aren’t just for laughs; they’re lucrative. Viral memes like Disaster Girl have been sold as NFTs (non-fungible tokens) fetching tens of thousands of dollars. Meme creators can monetize their work by owning the copyright in both the original images and the material added and licensing them for merchandise or advertising.
Memes and The Right of Publicity
The right of publicity protects an individual’s name, image, or likeness from being used for commercial purposes without consent. This law is often invoked when memes incorporate recognizable faces, voices, or identities, particularly of celebrities or public figures. While many memes fall under free speech or fair use when shared for humor or commentary, legal issues can arise if the meme is used in advertising, branding, or other commercial contexts.
Protecting Your Memes
If you’ve created an original meme, copyright law may safeguard it. Registering the copyright offers stronger protections, especially for commercial use. Trademarks may also apply if the meme becomes associated with a brand or product.
Final Thoughts
Memes are a cornerstone of internet culture, but their legal status remains murky. Meme creators should tread carefully, balancing humor and respect for IP laws. Whether you are a meme maker or a brand jumping on a trend, understanding the rules can ensure that your content spreads joy without landing you in a courtroom.
Kimberly McLean is Of Counsel with Fishman Stewart and has over 20 years of experience in IP law, focusing on patent prosecution and counseling in electrical arts, including software, cloud computing, blockchain, multimedia systems, autonomous vehicles, and artificial intelligence. As a former primary patent examiner at the US Patent and Trademark Office, she leverages her knowledge and experience to achieve successful outcomes for her clients.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
L.A.B. Golf aims to protect its innovations, and therefore its market position, owning three patents for its zero-torque design. The question now is whether L.A.B. Golf can withstand the wave of copycat designs.
One of his most famous songs, “Lose Yourself” was recently at the center of a lawsuit. In 2019, Eminem’s publishing company Eight Mile Style sued Spotify claiming that Spotify streamed a number of its musical compositions without proper licenses.
Our latest article tackles three common trademark questions: 1. Can I trademark my own name? 2. Can I trademark the name of a fictional character? 3. Can I trademark the name of a U.S. president or British royal?
One of the most common challenges is whether AI should be free to train on data that is protected by copyright and owned by third parties without first obtaining permission.
Like the titles of single creative works, character names do not generate trademark rights unless used for a series of creative works (meaning two or more). A year ago, Jane Wick, LLC filed a trademark application for the mark JANE WICK in logo format.
The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) recently published its latest report on AI and “copyrightability.” In short, the USCO considers only some AI-generated works to be sufficiently creative as to deserve copyright protection, and thus, registration.
We know that as of June 4, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had issued more than twelve million patents. We also know that more than 10,000 patents were in existence before the count began.
Back in the 1940’s assignments by independent contractors could be permanent and irrevocable. Things changed in 1976, when Congress overhauled the Copyright Act.
Generally, copyright protects the specific expression of ideas, such as the arrangement and presentation of visual elements, but it does not protect general concepts or styles.
In the age of the internet, memes are a universal language. A meme is a piece of content, typically an image, video, text, or a combination of these, that spreads rapidly across the internet, often with humorous, relatable, or satirical undertones.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
