Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 25, Issue 17
Share on Social
Beyond the Label: Protecting Consumer Trust in a Compounded World
Novo Nordisk is a Danish pharmaceutical company that makes the wildly successful drugs OZEMPIC® and WEGOVY®. These drugs are “glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists” whose generic name is semaglutide.
From mid 2022 until February of 2025, semaglutide was on the Food and Drug Administration Drug Shortages List, which enabled pharmacies and weight loss companies to compound semaglutide to make copycat versions of Novo Nordisk’s products, even though the drugs were still under patent protection. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), when a drug is listed as in shortage, Section 503A and 503B allow pharmacies to compound versions of the drug—even if it is patented—provided they are not “essentially a copy” of a commercially available product.
While semaglutide was on the national shortage list, Novo Nordisk relied heavily on the trademark laws for its intellectual property enforcement efforts. It filed numerous trademark infringement and false advertising lawsuits against compounders that used the OZEMPIC and WEGOVY names to indicate the comparability of their compounded semaglutide to Novo Nordisk’s products.
Normally, a de minimis use of a competitor’s trademark to enable consumers to compare products qualifies as a fair use of a competitor’s trademark under the trademark laws. In the advertising of their products, the compounders had made statements along the lines of “compounded semaglutide achieves the same results as Ozempic or Wegovy” and “compounded semaglutide has the same active ingredient as Ozempic or Wegovy.” Novo Nordisk argued that these compounders improperly used its trademarks for pharmaceutical products whose safety had not been proven.
Higher care is given to protection of drug names because of the potential harm to consumers if consumers are confused by drug names. The consequences of confusing two medications could be deadly, while confusing two brands of shampoo would just be aggravating. The Trademark Office applies a stricter standard for registration of trademarks for pharmaceuticals. The Food and Drug Administration must also approve all new drug names, and it conducts its own review for possible confusing or misleading names. And finally, the USAN Council approves all generic names (such as semaglutide) for new drugs. USAN conducts its own search for similar generic names to ensure safety, consistency and logic in the choice of names by avoiding conflict, misleading and confusion with other generic names and trademarks.
Novo Nordisk may well have benefited from this elevated standard in its enforcement activities. Its lawsuits against the compounders have largely been successful and largely were settled early.
After the FDA took semaglutide off the drug shortages list, Novo Nordisk was free to resume enforcement of its intellectual property rights in these drugs using both trademark and patent laws. It filed over a dozen new lawsuits in August alleging a combination of patent and trademark infringement.
As Novo Nordisk intensifies its enforcement efforts, the company is sending a clear message: it will aggressively protect its semaglutide-based therapies using all of the legal tools available to it. With the FDA shortage designation lifted and legal momentum building, these renewed actions mark a pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of GLP-1 treatments, setting a precedent for how drugmakers may defend their intellectual property in the face of compounding and commercialization challenges.
Michelle Visser is a partner of Fishman Stewart, with over 25 years of experience practicing trademark law with other members of the firm’s Trademark Group. Check out her full bio here.
Join Our October IP Bootcamp
This October, veteran Silicon Valley IP attorney Cecily O’Regan will be leading a four-week webinar series, Protecting and Leveraging Your Innovation: IP Strategies for Tech Startups. In just one hour a week, you’ll gain practical insights on patents, trademarks, and IP strategies to safeguard innovation and position your business for growth. Spots are limited, click here to sign up and reserve your seat today!
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
The fun internet trend of promoting "dupes" has officially crossed the trademark line and everyday content creators are finding themselves in the crosshairs of multimillion-dollar corporate lawsuits.
The FIFA World Cup is global football (or soccer) at its highest level. It is, however, also one of the most carefully crafted displays of intellectual property (IP) in the world.
Trademark owners are often cast as villains when they send cease-and-desist letters. But in trademark law, failing to enforce rights can sometimes create bigger problems than enforcing them.
Women’s sports are having a moment, and not a small one. And right alongside that rise: the business of women’s sports is heating up, including some surprisingly dramatic trademark battles.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
