Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 22, Issue 8
Share on Social
Ed Sheeran Wins ‘Shape of You’ Copyright Case, Dua Lipa Faces Uphill Battle for ‘Levitating’ Copyright Cases
With the number of newsworthy copyright infringement lawsuits on the rise, a few questions come to mind. For example, is it true that if a song is a hit, a copyright infringement lawsuit will follow? Are well-known artists being unfairly targeted? Are plaintiffs merely looking for quick paydays, assuming that an artist facing an infringement lawsuit would rather settle then fight it out in court? Or are well-known artists simply stealing from lesser-known artists? You be the judge and listen to the controversial tracks below.
Recently, Ed Sheeran won a U.K. copyright infringement lawsuit over his famous 2017 song “Shape of You.” Sheeran was sued by artist Sam Chokri (aka Sami Switch) and music producer Ross O’Donoghue, who alleged that Sheeran copied lines from their 2015 song “Oh Why.” Specifically, it was alleged that the refrain “Oh I, Oh I, Oh I” from the chorus of “Shape of you” was copied from the line “Oh why, Oh why, Oh why” of their song. In a unique move to bolster his defense, Sheeran sang in court to illustrate how the melody is commonplace across pop music.
Within a span of a week, Dua Lipa was sued twice for copyright infringement for her hit song “Levitating.” The first suit was filed by the reggae band Artikal Sound System who alleged that Lipa’s song infringes their song “Live Your Life.” The second suit was brought by L. Russel Brown and Sandy Linzer who were the composers of the songs “Wiggle and Giggle All Night” and “Don Diablo.”
To prove copyright infringement, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant had access to the plaintiff’s copyrighted work, and that the defendant’s work is “substantially similar” to the copyright work. But what qualifies as “substantially similar” for the complex and abstract art of the music industry?
Music cannot often be reduced to just a few comparable elements. The works must be compared as a whole as well as by the many individual musical elements that make up the work, including pitch, timing, melody, harmony, rhythm, lyrics, and instrumentation among many others. This is why forensic musicologists often play vital roles in these types of copyright infringement cases.
Forensic musicologists dissect and compare the songs from every angle imaginable, including historical influences and common tropes of existing musical styles. The musicologist’s report is a thorough examination of the conflicting works through a lens that goes far beyond the lay listener’s reception of the song over the radio. The reports often feature visualized sound graphs, isolated vocals and instrumentation, and established musical theory. Most importantly, an experienced musicologist can effectively convey the complexities of the report to the audience, a panel of judges or a jury, in a way that promotes understanding and justice.
With these rigorous examinations, songs that sound the same may not ultimately be copying one another, and songs that are seemingly unalike may have elements that are stolen. While art is a subjective medium, arbiters of the law seek to employ objective tests and measurements in these cases to reach a fair conclusion. A difficult feat, especially considering these courtroom decisions can impact how artists express themselves.
Ultimately, the court in the Sheeran case ruled that Sheeran “neither deliberately nor subconsciously” copied lines from “Oh Why.” The court determined that there was no evidence that Sheeran actually heard the song “Oh Why” before writing “Shape of You” and that there were material differences between relevant parts of each song. Dua Lipa’s cases are in progress. It will be interesting to see how they play out. Keep an eye out for future Fish Tank® articles for updates.
“I’m happy it’s over. I’m happy we can move on and get back to writing songs,” said Sheeran.
Published April 22, 2022
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
In the digital age, social media has become a powerful platform for content creation, enabling individuals and businesses to reach wide audiences. Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube have made it easy for anyone with a smartphone and an internet connection to create and share content.
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a jury verdict holding that the use of the "Success Kid" meme by a congressman's reelection campaign for fundraising purposes did not qualify as fair use.
In February 2024, proposed legislation was introduced in US House of Representatives which would extend copyright protection to golf courses. The bill is titled “Bolstering Intellectual Rights against Digital Infringement Enhancement Act” or the “BIRDIE Act”.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®