Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 19
Share on Social
Dressed to Travel
By Alexander JSW Johnson
Trademarks travel. In many ways, that’s one of the primary purposes of a trademark—to distribute the reputation of the brand’s owner widely and efficiently. It is for this reason that trademark registrations issued by the U.S. Trademark Office are entitled to nationwide rights.
Sometimes trademark attorneys also travel, and yours truly is about to take a flight for a family vacation this weekend—which naturally got me thinking about trademarks-in-flight: airplane trademarks.
Names like UNITED and DELTA are quite famous, but there are trademarks for planes and designs of planes themselves. These types of trademarks are often referred to as “Trade Dress.”
Trade dress does not refer to a full-body, legless garment for wearing on Wall Street (though that might be a good brand idea for a quippy clothier in Manhattan). Trade dress means the way one’s trade has dressed itself—symbols and indicia associated with the presentation of goods or services.
For example, Boeing has registered a trademark for the physical shape of the plane’s fuselage (body of the plane), as shown by the solid line portion of the image below.

The next aircraft design protected by trade dress gets a special shout-out from this Cedar Rapids, Iowa, native: the American Eagle Regional Jet. These smaller regional planes provided connections for me and my fellow Cedar Rapidians to major airports like Chicago O’Hare (and beyond, usually—if Chicago was the final stop, we drove).

Speaking of Chicago, Southwest Airlines operates 260 daily flights from Midway. As the most recognizable trade dress in this article, the Southwest plane below stands out.

Why do some brands claim shapes or contours of a plane, others the colors and patterns? Why do some claim airplanes as goods and others transportation as a service?
Well, Boeing registers its airplane shape for goods because it won’t put its artwork on the plane’s exterior; that’s for its customers, i.e., the airlines, to do.
Similarly, American Airlines and Southwest do not claim rights in the planes’ shapes because they purchase the planes from Boeing and other plane manufacturers. The airlines then place their marks on those aircraft, and they sell air travel to their customers, i.e., the passengers like you and me.
Next time you check in for your flight, check out your plane’s contours and attire. It’d be a win for me if you looked at the plane and thought, “hey, nice dress—trade dress, that is.”
Alexander JSW Johnson is an attorney at Fishman Stewart with more than 10 years of extensive experience in trademark and intellectual property matters. He works in the firm’s Trademark Practice Group. He holds a B.A. in Art (studio emphasis) and Journalism.
Published October 20, 2023


Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
