Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 22, Issue 23
Share on Social
COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR SHOES, JEWELLERY, FURNITURE? In Italy you can!
By Guest Author: Carlo Sala
Ski Season is nearly upon us! And nothing says après-ski like Moon Boots, the iconic footwear created by Italian shoemaker Tecnica Group in 1969, after the Apollo 11 moon landing. Since then, the boots have enjoyed several waves of popularity as each generation rediscovers their classical style. In fact, in 2000, the Louvre Museum in Paris, France showcased a pair of Moon Boots as one of the 100 most iconic items of the 20th century. And in 2018, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York placed a pair of Moon Boots in its permanent art collection.
Even more impressive, is that, as a consequence, Moon Boots are protected by copyright law in Italy. Generally, copyright law protects original works from unauthorized copying. In the U.S., copyright protection generally does not extend to “useful” articles, like shoes, but can protect the designs on shoes, like that of the Yeezy Boost 350 sneakers. However, in Italy, the global fashion powerhouse since the 15th century, copyright law can protect shoes—like Moon Boots.
Italy is a member of the European Union, which has been attempting to harmonize its copyright laws among its Member States. EU Member States are entitled to protect product designs (meaning the appearance of the whole or a part of a product, like the product’s lines, contours, colors, shape, texture and/or materials and/or its ornamentation). But it is up to each Member State, if willing, to grant copyright protection to product designs, and to determine the conditions and scope of copyright protection for product designs.
In Italy, birthplace of the Moon Boots, copyright protection extends to works of industrial design that have inherent “creative character and artistic value.” This means that industrial design works can benefit from copyright protection provided they have creative character (meaning they are an original expression of the author and are an expression of the author’s personality even if they have been inspired by another existing work), and they have an artistic value. Indeed, who decides what has “artistic value” and how?
The Court of Milan had the opportunity to shed some light on this issue. The designer (and well-known Italian influencer) Chiara Ferragni was making and selling “snow boots” that were nearly identical to Tecnica’s famous Moon Boots, and Tecnica sued for copyright infringement. The Court held that the Moon Boots were protected by copyright, in part, due to the “artistic value” of the design. The Court stated that when looking for “artistic value” the judge should look at the cultural sector. The fact that the Moon Boots had been displayed by major museums such as the Louvre and MoMa was decisive to establish their artistic value. The Court held that Chiara Ferragni’s snow boots were infringing and ordered her to stop selling her snow boots and pay Tecnica damages.
However, Italian design, and Italian copyright protection, extends beyond clothing and footwear to other consumer items, and the tendency is to enlarge the scope of protection of copyrightable designs to make it compatible with the existing case law of the European Court of Justice, which is the court that gives preliminary rulings concerning the interpretation of the acts of the EU bodies. Below are examples of designs that are protected in Italy under copyright rules:
Moon Boots LC2 Le Courboisier Armchair
Panton Chair
Published November 11, 2022
Fishman Stewart garners repeat recognition by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers® as a tier-one law firm on its annual list of “Best Law Firms”
· Litigation – Intellectual Property
· Litigation – Patent
· Patent Law
· Trademark Law
The 2023 “Best Law Firms” ranking for Fishman Stewart is available here. More information on the 2023 “Best Law Firms” methodology is available here. In addition to U.S. News & World Report, the national and metro Tier 1 rankings will also be published in print in the 13th Edition of “Best Law Firms.”
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®