Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 22, Issue 22
Share on Social
Trick-or-Treat: Trademark Infringement or Harmless Halloween Fun?
By Linda M. Callaghan
With the abundant commercialization of the holidays, Halloween has morphed into a month-long celebration allowing trick-or-treaters to attend numerous events to don their costumes. Adults and children alike spend hours perusing the many pop-up Halloween stores and supermarket aisles searching for the “perfect” costume. Consumers have grown accustomed to seeing knock-off costumes based on popular celebrities and movie or book characters. Some of these knock-off costumes, while attempting to skirt intellectual property violations, are providing unexpected humor for shoppers.
Many popular fictional characters may be protected by various forms of intellectual property law. For example, the name of a fictional character from a book or a movie may be a registered trademark, such as DISNEY ALADDIN.
Presumably, to avoid paying licensing fees that would cut into profits, costume makers have taken to the use of descriptive wording to sell costumes. For instance, the below costume packaging advertises a red and white striped shirt and winter hat with big, round, black rimmed glasses as “Where’s the Stripey Dude?” The costume is clearly meant to be Waldo from the WHERE’S WALDO? series of books and movies. The costume maker is trying to avoid a trademark infringement accusation by cleverly describing the costume without actually using the trademark itself on the packaging. Of course, the trademark owner may still bring a lawsuit, and the question will be whether consumers are likely to be confused or believe that Where’s the Stripey Dude? is somehow related to WHERE’S WALDO? or Viacom (the WHERE’S WALDO? trademark owner). Given the lengths that the makers of Where’s the Stripey Dude? have gone to avoid using the WHERE’S WALDO? trademark, it is questionable whether anyone but the most naïve consumer would believe they are purchasing a genuine WHERE’S WALDO? costume. Moreover, is it questionable whether Viacom has any interest in policing potential infringement, since it allowed its WHERE’S WALDO? trademark applications and registrations to lapse.
However, the below knock-off Aladdin costume advertised as “A-Lad-In a Costume,” while quite amusing, seems to be begging for a lawsuit. The use of “A-Lad-In” is much closer to “Aladdin” in pronunciation and appearance, which are factors to consider when assessing whether there is likely to be any consumer confusion, and thus, any trademark infringement.
In any event, these creative knock-off costumes are providing some comic relief for customers while searching for Halloween costumes. We suggest dressing up as anything except an intellectual property infringer!
Have a safe and happy Halloween! For some online trick-or-treating, stop by our swag page and help yourself to some goodies.
Linda is a Partner at Fishman Stewart, specializing in intellectual property law. Linda focuses mainly on trademark and copyright law, including foreign and domestic prosecution and litigation, as well as agreements and assignments. Check out her full bio here.
Published October 27, 2022
Fishman Stewart partner Michael Fishman named to 2022 class of Leaders in the Law by Michigan Lawyers Weekly
Troy, Mich.—October 13, 2022— Intellectual property law firm Fishman Stewart PLLC is pleased to announce that Michael Fishman, a founding firm partner, has been included in the 2022 class of Leaders in the Law by Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
Read the full press release here to learn more about Michael Fishman and Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
September 19th is International Talk Like a Pirate Day. In terms of intellectual property, “pirating” refers to the unauthorized copying, distribution, or use of someone else's creative work without their permission, and often for personal or financial gain.
School names and their indicia are now a big source of revenue and local schools’ merchandise is found alongside college and pro sports merchandise. However, included with the increased visibility from the monetization and use of school names and mascots are trademark infringement risks.
National Red Wine Day is observed each year on August 28th. This year, to celebrate, we are sharing a fun story about wine, trademarks, and legal battle over the rights to use a family name on wine labels.
Have you ever wondered what was the very first work to receive a copyright registration in the United States?
The words “generative artificial intelligence” or “generative AI” have been crowding headlines for months with stories about the potential benefits and perils to humans. This article breaks down the top questions and answers we encounter regarding AI and intellectual property.
How many ways are there to tape a banana to a wall? Yes, this is a serious legal question. In fact, this was the question presented in a recent copyright infringement lawsuit in Florida.
Under US copyright law, to receive protection, a work must be “fixed” which means that a work must be expressed or embodied in a material medium that lasts for more than a transitory period.
In a rare unanimous decision, the Supreme Court sided with Jack Daniel’s Properties, reversing the Ninth Circuit decision that found VIP Products’ dog chew toy, a non-infringing parody of the trademark rights Jack Daniel’s holds in its name, JACK DANIEL’S, OLD NO. 7, the label, and bottle design.
People like tacos on Tuesdays. They just do. It’s even fun to say: “Taco Tuesday.” But since 1995, Registrant has owned a federal trademark registration for “Taco Tuesday.” Not cool.
The US Copyright Office recently made headlines for partially revoking a copyright registration it previously issued for an AI-generated graphic novel. Artist Kristina Kashtanova used the Midjourney platform to create images that she included in her graphic novel called Zarya of the Dawn.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
