Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 5
Share on Social
Trade-MARK MADNESS
By Norman K. Freda
The NCAA lost over $800 million in 2020 when it canceled the tournament due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, the NCAA rebounded by bringing in $1.16 billion, nearly 90% (or around $1 billion) of which came from the NCAA tournament alone. With that kind of money on the line, it’s no wonder bars, restaurants, apparel retailers, media corporations, sports books, and everyone in-between—including urologists whose demand for vasectomies rises 30% during the first weekend of the tournament—will dive on the floor to seize this opportunity to increase revenue as fans gear up, go out, and become enthralled with the NCAA tournament.
As valuable as March Madness is for these ancillary businesses, using the phrase March Madness can yield April Sadness. The NCAA has registered many trademarks associated with the NCAA tournament, including MARCH MADNESS, ELITE EIGHT, FINAL FOUR, THE BIG DANCE, SELECTION SUNDAY, MARCH MAYHEM, SPRING MADNESS, MIDNIGHT MADNESS, MUNCH MADNESS, FIRST FOUR, and more. The NCAA is notorious for aggressively protecting and enforcing its trademark rights; it has sued an online fantasy games maker for using APRIL MADNESS and FINAL 3, a car dealership for using MARKDOWN MADNESS, and a urology practice for using VASECTOMY MADNESS and VASECTOMY MAYHEM. The NCAA even went up against the Big Ten Conference—a collegiate athletic conference comprised of NCAA member universities and NCAA tourney regulars—opposing the Big Ten’s federal trademark application for the mark MARCH IS ON! that the Big Ten had been using for seven years.
If you are looking to capitalize on the NCAA tournament, make sure to draw up your promotional play with a trademark attorney beforehand. The NCAA has shown it is quick to blow the whistle and call a foul when it comes to its trademarks for its most lucrative assets.
Norman K. Freda is an attorney at Fishman Stewart and practices in the fields of patent, trademark, copyright law, and litigation. He holds a BS degree in Applied Engineering Sciences from Michigan State University. Check out his bio.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
People are familiar with the most famous examples of trademarks which have been “lost”—or almost lost.
If you are looking to capitalize on the NCAA tournament, make sure to draw up your promotional play with a trademark attorney beforehand.
This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” and the idea has been around for a long time. The theory is that mailing a copy of a work to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service.
Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain.
Unlike the Matrix, Star Wars, and Austin Powers, respectively, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, or ChatGPT, is not a robot in disguise or a bot of science fiction. We, the users, provide prompts in text form, and ChatGPT converses in response to the prompts.
Mariah Carey filed a U.S. trademark application attempting to claim trademark rights to “QUEEN OF CHRISTMAS” for a wide range of different goods and services including alcoholic beverages, online retail services, dog collars, musical recordings, body lotions, spa items, Christmas decorations, and even lactose-free milk.
Recently, we filed an application to register the copyright for Finny the Fish. In the United States, and in many other countries, copyright protection arises at the moment a work is fixed in tangible medium. So, why would we take the extra step to register Finny’s copyright?
With the 2022 midterms (almost) in the rearview mirror, political junkies are now free to turn their full attention to the 2024 presidential election. Today’s focus is on the tug of war that can occur when candidates play music at campaign events.
Both trademark law and copyright law may protect your logo, although the protection they provide differs. Trademark law would prohibit the unauthorized use of another’s logo that is sufficiently similar to your logo such that it is likely to cause confusion in the marketplace.
In the U.S., copyright protection generally does not extend to “useful” articles, like shoes, but can protect the designs on shoes, like that of the Yeezy Boost 350 sneakers. However, in Italy, the global fashion powerhouse since the 15th century, copyright law can protect shoes—like Moon Boots.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
