Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 22, Issue 13
Share on Social
The European Union Refuses to “THINK DIFFERENT”
Many people may remember Apple’s iconic trademark THINK DIFFERENT from the late 1990s. The advertising campaign made a big splash with both television and print ads featuring images of several famous influential leaders throughout time, such as Albert Einstein, Jim Henson, Martin Luther King, Jr. and even Steve Jobs himself. The campaign spanned nearly a decade and won several awards including an Emmy Award for Best Commercial. The mark is still used on packaging for the company’s iMac computers.
However, the General Court of the European Union recently held that Apple’s use of the mark was not genuine trademark use sufficient to prevent cancellation of its registrations. The court upheld a prior decision by the European Union Intellectual Property Office to cancel Apple’s three European Union trademark registrations for the mark in connection with computers and computer related products. The court cited insufficient use of the term in a trademark manner as the basis for its ruling. Although the court found that Apple’s use of the mark in the late 1990s, and for a period of about 10 years thereafter, constituted use as a trademark, it ultimately held that Apple’s use during the relevant period of examination for the proceeding, namely October 2011 to October 2016, did not rise to the level of genuine trademark use. Below is an example of Apple’s product packaging showing use of the mark during the relevant time period.
The court took issue with the size and placement of the mark on the packaging and noted that consumers would likely overlook the small print located underneath the technical specifications. The court reasoned that such small font and placement was not likely to draw consumers’ attention, and thus, the mark did not identify the commercial origin of the products. By contrast, under U.S. trademark law, the above product packaging is acceptable to support a U.S. federal trademark registration and in fact was used to renew Apple’s U.S. registration for the mark as late as 2013.
Nevertheless, the loss of Apple’s EU registrations is a big blow to the company given the notoriety of the mark and the fact that many people still associate the iconic mark with Apple. Apple has not yet commented on the decision.
It will be interesting to see whether Apple continues to renew its other registrations for the mark in the future. One factor that may have an impact on Apple’s future course of action is its ongoing feud with the Swiss watch manufacturer Swatch AG, which had initiated the cancellation proceeding that resulted in the outcome in this case. Swatch and Apple are engaged in several contentious trademark battles. At any rate, this case serves as a good lesson for EU trademark registration owners: when it comes to proving genuine trademark use, size and placement matter!
Published June 24, 2022
Finny continues his adventures around the world!
Sir Finnegan, known as “Finny” to his school of family and friends, is taking a trip to explore the diversity of intellectual property all around the world. If you see Finny on his journey, please take a picture of Finny and post it on social media with the hashtag #FollowFinny so we can track his progress. A plush toy of Finny is available to take home HERE.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
People are familiar with the most famous examples of trademarks which have been “lost”—or almost lost.
If you are looking to capitalize on the NCAA tournament, make sure to draw up your promotional play with a trademark attorney beforehand.
This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” and the idea has been around for a long time. The theory is that mailing a copy of a work to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service.
Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain.
Unlike the Matrix, Star Wars, and Austin Powers, respectively, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, or ChatGPT, is not a robot in disguise or a bot of science fiction. We, the users, provide prompts in text form, and ChatGPT converses in response to the prompts.
Mariah Carey filed a U.S. trademark application attempting to claim trademark rights to “QUEEN OF CHRISTMAS” for a wide range of different goods and services including alcoholic beverages, online retail services, dog collars, musical recordings, body lotions, spa items, Christmas decorations, and even lactose-free milk.
Recently, we filed an application to register the copyright for Finny the Fish. In the United States, and in many other countries, copyright protection arises at the moment a work is fixed in tangible medium. So, why would we take the extra step to register Finny’s copyright?
With the 2022 midterms (almost) in the rearview mirror, political junkies are now free to turn their full attention to the 2024 presidential election. Today’s focus is on the tug of war that can occur when candidates play music at campaign events.
Both trademark law and copyright law may protect your logo, although the protection they provide differs. Trademark law would prohibit the unauthorized use of another’s logo that is sufficiently similar to your logo such that it is likely to cause confusion in the marketplace.
In the U.S., copyright protection generally does not extend to “useful” articles, like shoes, but can protect the designs on shoes, like that of the Yeezy Boost 350 sneakers. However, in Italy, the global fashion powerhouse since the 15th century, copyright law can protect shoes—like Moon Boots.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
