Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 5
Share on Social
More than One Way to Slice a Potato?
By Kristyn Webb
The dispute began in 2016 when chip-maker Simplot sued rival chip-maker McCain, alleging that McCain’s spiral-cut “Twisted Potato” design infringed Simplot’s design patent US D640036 for a “Spiral Potato Piece.” A few months later, McCain counter sued alleging that Simplot’s spiral-cut “Sidewinders” infringed McCains’ design patent US D720916 for a “Root Vegetable Product.” McCain also alleged that Simplot’s chips infringed its utility patent US 6821540 for a “Process for Treating Vegetables and Fruit Before Cooking” involving the use of a “pulse electric field” to soften fruits and vegetables before they are cut.
Fast forward several years, and after numerous motions, responses, and replies, to January 2024: the court hearing the case in Idaho (the potato capital of the world), has denied the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and concluded that the case should go to trial.
The ‘540 patent refers to passing an electric current through the fruit or vegetable before cutting and cooking. The parties disagree about whether Simplot’s method of partially heating the potatoes in oil (“parfrying”) falls within the meaning of “cooking” or whether the patent only covers products that are totally cooked and ready to eat.
Regarding the competing design patents, the court concluded that it was best left for a jury to decide whether the parties’ respective design patents and the accused products are similar enough for any findings of infringement. So, after several years of litigation, 120 docket entries, and a 141-page ruling, it appears the case is (finally) headed to trial. We hope the jury will at least get a chance to sample the accused products!
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Published March 22, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In recent years, companies have gravitated toward a visual trend: the minimalist logo. While some critics dismiss the trend, the shift toward minimalism is rooted in something else other than fashion.
When the Oakland Athletics announced plans to relocate to Las Vegas in 2028, many fans were excited. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently threw a curveball by refusing the team’s trademark applications for “Las Vegas Athletics” and “Vegas Athletics.”
Advances in molecular biology have an uncanny knack of doing two things at once: saving lives and giving U.S. patent law a persistent headache.
Artificial Christmas trees have become an enduring symbol of holiday cheer, blending tradition with innovation. Today, they are celebrated for their convenience, sustainability, and versatility, but their story began centuries ago as a creative solution to environmental and safety concerns.
Doosan Bobcat North America filed federal and international lawsuits against Caterpillar alleging Caterpillar improperly reverse engineered loader components.
Nothing warms the holiday spirit quite like a copyright lawsuit over a light-up reindeer. Back in 2019, two companies went head-to-head over just that when Enchant sued Glowco for copyright infringement.
The real tech revolution in sports right now is being powered by AI that uses data from wearable sensors - and crunches numbers faster than any coach with a clipboard could.
The real tech revolution in sports right now is being powered by AI that uses data from wearable sensors - and crunches numbers faster than any coach with a clipboard could.
If your inbox has been serving up dramatic “copyright infringement” cease and desist letters lately, you’re not imagining it. Scam C&Ds are having a moment.
In British and American culture, finding a penny is traditionally considered to be sign of luck - but how long until we stop finding them altogether?
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
