Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 22, Issue 16
Share on Social
James Webb Space Telescope Images Released to the Public and to the Public Domain
By Kristyn Webb
On July 12, 2022, the world was collectively wowed by the stunning images sent back to Earth by the James Webb* Space Telescope. NASA, in partnership with the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), built and launched the $10 billion infrared telescope as a successor to the aging Hubble Space Telescope, launched in 1990. The James Webb Space Telescope is about a hundred times more sensitive than the Hubble Space Telescope, and the improvements can clearly be seen in the side-by-side images of the SMACS 0723 galaxy field which is roughly 4.6 billion light-years from Earth:
HUBBEL: JAMES WEBB:
Credit: ESA/Hubble Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, and STScI
For scale, the slice of heaven depicted in each of these images is about the size of a grain of sand held at arm’s length.
Almost as amazing as the images, was the quantity of products bearing these images that flooded online marketplaces. Within hours of the first images being released, they were put onto fanny packs, sweatshirts, posters, travel mugs, and the like. Enterprising merchants swiftly capitalized on the news coverage and the public interest that the images generated. For each celestial body that can be seen in the James Webb image above, there are least a dozen online retailers selling products bearing the same image.
This merchandizing free-for-all is made possible by the fact that the images from the James Webb telescope reside in the public domain. Subject to a few exceptions, under U.S. copyright law, works created by the federal government and its agencies are copyright-free. This means that anyone is free to copy, publish, distribute, adapt, and otherwise use the works.
Some of the products also depicted one or more of NASA’s logos. Unlike the public domain images, which are free for anyone to use, permission is required to use NASA’s name or logos on products and advertisements for goods and services.
In fact, NASA’s logos are protected by two federal statutes. One statute prohibits the use of NASA’s name, initials, or logos from use that would suggest NASA’s affiliation or endorsement of a product or service. The other statute criminalizes any use of the agency’s “insignia,” except as permitted by government regulations. NASA’s regulations permit use of its name and logos on a case-by-case basis and the agency publishes its merchandising guidelines on its website. To foster public support, NASA regularly partners with various private companies to produce NASA-branded merchandise such as bags, t-shirts, and hats.
So, if you are looking to start up your own line of swag featuring the James Webb images, have at it. But, read the fine print if you plan to use NASA’s name or logos, so you don’t commit a federal crime.
*The James Webb telescope was named in honor of former NASA administrator James Edwin Webb (no relation to this author) who oversaw the Apollo program.
Kristyn C. Webb is an associate attorney at Fishman Stewart and works in the firm’s trademark, copyright, and litigation practice groups. She is currently seeking a post graduate law degree in UK, EU, and US Copyright Law at King’s College London. Check out her full bio here.
Published August 11, 2022
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
The US Copyright Office recently made headlines for partially revoking a copyright registration it previously issued for an AI-generated graphic novel. Artist Kristina Kashtanova used the Midjourney platform to create images that she included in her graphic novel called Zarya of the Dawn.
Ed Sheeran recently successfully defended against a copyright infringement lawsuit over his 2014 hit “Thinking Out Loud.” Songwriter Ed Townsend’s heirs brought the suit alleging Sheeran had infringed Townsend’s copyrights in the 1973 Motown classic, “Let’s Get It On” which Townsend co-authored with Marvin Gaye.
American publishing houses consistently snapped up the works of the famous British author, re-published them in cheap editions, which sold all over the country, and they pocketed the proceeds without any remuneration to Charles Dickens.
For many of us, the term “Easter egg” conjures up memories of dying hard-boiled eggs in bright colors or hunting for treasures and candies stuffed inside plastic orbs hidden around the neighborhood.
Each of us is creative. The key is to leverage that creativity, converting it into an intellectual property asset that enhances enterprise value.
This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” and the idea has been around for a long time. The theory is that mailing a copy of a work to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service.
Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain.
Unlike the Matrix, Star Wars, and Austin Powers, respectively, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, or ChatGPT, is not a robot in disguise or a bot of science fiction. We, the users, provide prompts in text form, and ChatGPT converses in response to the prompts.
Recently, we filed an application to register the copyright for Finny the Fish. In the United States, and in many other countries, copyright protection arises at the moment a work is fixed in tangible medium. So, why would we take the extra step to register Finny’s copyright?
With the 2022 midterms (almost) in the rearview mirror, political junkies are now free to turn their full attention to the 2024 presidential election. Today’s focus is on the tug of war that can occur when candidates play music at campaign events.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
