Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 22, Issue 7
Share on Social
This is the Way: Disney’s Path to Protecting Baby Yoda
By Melissa M. Chapman
As Disney+ subscribers tuned into The Mandalorian in November of 2019, they could not have expected the break-through character that was about to be introduced into the Star Wars universe: Grogu, commonly referred to as “Baby Yoda” or “The Child.” Grogu quickly became one of the most popular television show characters of recent history. But what exactly made this character so special?
Despite the character’s reception as cute and meme-worthy, the surprise and delight of an unannounced character may have also played a role in the character’s success. Star Wars ran into issues in the past with plotlines and new characters being spoiled ahead of a movie release. For example, trading cards released in 1980 revealed Han Solo encased in carbonite, spoiling his unfortunate “fate” well before the release of Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back. More recently, LucasFilm filed a new trademark application for Boba Fett ahead of the fan-favorite character’s appearance in Season 2 of The Mandalorian. Viewers lurking the internet for spoilers found the trademark application, leading to theories of Boba Fett’s appearance before his episode aired.
Sensing Grogu’s potential, the character was deliberately kept secret by Disney. Grogu was withheld from all pre-release marketing and merchandise, screeners of the pilot episode were not distributed, and no trademark applications regarding the character were filed. When Grogu finally hit the screen, the surprise appearance skyrocketed him to fame.
However, secrecy came at a price. With a release so close to the holiday season and no official merchandise yet available, fans turned to unlicensed merchandise and products featuring the character from websites like Etsy and Amazon Marketplace. In fact, Disney – normally a strict enforcer of its intellectual property – seemingly allowed unauthorized merchandise to continue to be sold until it was prepared to file its trademark applications and make available its official merchandise. It is estimated that Disney potentially missed out on $2.7 million in potential revenue, simply due to the delay in releasing official Grogu merchandise, after the holiday season. This leads to the question: Was it worth it?
Infamous for its aggressive protection of intellectual property, it was uncharacteristic of Disney to not file a trademark application or otherwise protect the Grogu intellectual property prior to the show’s release. While the company may have left merchandise sales on the table, the explosion of internet fame raised significant awareness of the television show. The Mandalorian landed at No. 14 on Nielsen’s overall list of most watched streaming TV shows and movies of 2020, and No. 5 on Nielsen’s list of top streaming original series of 2020. Moreover, interest in Grogu helped Disney+ amass over 26 million subscribers to its streaming services within the first three months after launching.
While we are unable to say “This is always the way”, the strategy worked for Disney in this instance. The numbers speak for themselves. The long-term value of keeping “Baby Yoda” a secret played out well in the Star Wars galaxy.
Published April 1, 2022
Finny continues his adventures around the world!
This week, Finny was spotted at Trafalgar Square in England, Oceanside Pier in California, and Central Park in New York. Follow Finny and see more of his adventures HERE.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
