Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 22, Issue 20
Share on Social
Amazon, Infringers and Design Patents: A Cautionary Tale
By: Doug P. LaLone
Combating copycats on Amazon can be an expensive, frustrating endeavor. This is doubly true when simultaneously taking on both copycats and Amazon.
It is all too common of a story for sellers on Amazon: a listing pops up purporting to sell a replica of your patented, copyrighted, or trademarked goods. You file a complaint with Amazon, but receive only a canned, automated response from Amazon that no action will be taken because the listing does not infringe your rights. You resubmit the form, and receive the same response, over and over again. You look for a hotline with the hope of speaking with a human, but you are redirected to the online form.
Eventually, after numerous submissions and denials from Amazon, you succeed in having the listing removed, but three more listings pop up overnight. You are playing an endless game of Whac-A-Mole. You file requests that Amazon remove those new listings, the way it eventually removed the last listing, only to be told, once again, that Amazon does not believe the new listings infringe your rights-despite its previous conclusions to the contrary with other, identical listings. You submit more requests, until you either (1) successfully see the listing removed, or (2) your account is suspended by Amazon because you submitted too many requests. We feel this pain acutely, since we recently went through a similar experience on behalf of one of our clients.
Understanding Amazon’s business model might help shed light on the challenges vendors face in enforcing their intellectual property rights on the platform. Particularly in the US, entrepreneurs and small businesses selling products on Amazon prefer to ship their products from their own facilities. In such cases, Amazon makes around 20% commission for everything sold. For counterfeit products, many of which originate overseas, such sellers often store their goods in one of Amazon’s mega distribution centers. In those cases, Amazon makes even more money, around 50% of every sale (20% for the commission, plus another 30% for warehousing and distribution fees). These rates fluctuate, and in some cases are even higher.
Thus, on its face, there is a perverse economic incentive for Amazon to continue to sell infringing products of foreign vendors at the expense of US intellectual property rights owners. Even more problematic, Amazon has been accused of stealing the designs of its vendors with some of its own Amazon branded products.
For Amazon vendors, properly securing your intellectual property may provide the much-needed legal leverage to combat copycats, especially on Amazon. For Amazon buyers, the next time you shop on Amazon, look for those products that say they are patented. You could be helping a local innovator protect its valuable asset, and its revenue stream!
Published September 30, 2022
Kudos to Big Whitetail Dream
We congratulate client Big Whitetail Dreams, a US company that secured a design patent protecting its J-Hook shaped bow and arrow gear hanger. It successfully leveraged its design patent against numerous infringers that were selling knock offs on Amazon. Here’s an example of one infringing product:
Big Whitetail Dreams’ Design Patent: Infringer’s Gear Hanger:
Doug LaLone is an engineer, patent attorney, and partner at Fishman Stewart. He also serves as chair of the firm’s Strategic IP Practice Group which counsels portfolio companies, PE, VC and IB firms on intellectual property strategies, due diligence and portfolio management. Check out his bio.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
In the US, Thanksgiving is quickly approaching. For many, Thanksgiving and (American) football go hand-in-hand, with the Detroit Lions’ game as much a staple of the holiday as turkey and pie. However, this year’s game arrives amid controversy: Lions’ legendary Hall of Famer Barry Sanders is facing a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement.
After three years of litigation, a court has held that the “beat that goes on” for Cher’s right to continue receiving royalties on songs created during her marriage to Sonny Bono, despite attempts by Sonny’s widow, Mary Bono, to invoke federal copyright termination rights to end those payments.
Watching scary movies is a time-honored Halloween tradition, and one of the greatest movies to watch this time of year is “Ghostbusters” which premiered in 1984.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ordered the cancellation of four U.S. trademark registrations for SUPER HERO and SUPER HEROES owned jointly by Marvel Characters, Inc. and DC Comics.
Halloween is coming up at the end of this month, and we are celebrating a little early with the spooky copyright story of Jap Herron!
In 2023, California artist Joe Morford lost his copyright infringement lawsuit against Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan. Morford claimed that Cattelan's viral artwork "Comedian," which features a banana duct-taped to a wall, was a copy of his own work, "Banana and Orange."
Last month, Outkast filed suit against ATLiens Touring, seeking an injunction against ATLiens Touring’s continued use of ATLiens and seeking damages.
Imagine opening a brand-new box of 64-color Crayola Crayons. Take a whiff. No matter how or where or when you grew up, this is a scent you know. We all know. But is that enough to obtain a US federal trademark registration?
Historically, “bad word” marks would have been refused as “immoral” or “scandalous.” That changed due to the Supreme Court’s 2019 Iancu v. Brunetti decision.
Fourteen teams of the US National Basketball Association (NBA) have been sued in federal district court for copyright infringement. The complaints were filed by companies claiming to own rights in various musical works.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
