Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 2
Share on Social
Who Can Read My Manuscript?
By Kristyn Webb
A few years ago, the Copyright Office received a large number of requests from Twilight fans who wanted to get a peek at the registered and unpublished manuscript of Stephanie Meyer’s Forever Dawn. Meyer wrote the manuscript in 2003, and registered the work with the Copyright Office in 2004, but fans were generally unaware of its existence until Meyer spoke about it in a Q&A event in 2020—even though Forever Dawn’s registration with the Copyright Office was cited in court pleadings when Meyer was sued by a fellow vampire-fiction writer Jordan Scott in 2009 for allegedly copying his book The Nocturne which was published in 2006. The requests from the public to inspect Copyright Office records prompted authors to wonder whether submitting their works for registration with the Copyright Office will make them available for anyone to read.
The Copyright Office requires that you submit a copy of your work in order for it to be registered. For unpublished works, the Copyright Office will retain a copy of the work for the duration of the term of protection. For published works, the Copyright Office may select certain works to be retained and made available in the Library of Congress if the applicant submitted physical copies of the work.
Submitting works does not mean that the public will have free access to them. For a member of the public to obtain a copy, they must submit a request to the Copyright Office and pay a fee. A proper request must include (1) the permission of the copyright owner, (2) a court order to produce the copy, or (3) a statement that there is active or prospective litigation involving the registered work.
Works submitted may be made available for public inspection by appointment on site at the Copyright Office in Washington D.C. However, unless the person has permission of the copyright owner, they cannot make copies or take photographs of the work.
In 2020, in-person services were halted for a while at the Copyright Office due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Once the Copyright Office resumed taking appointments, a number of fans made the trip to read the Forever Dawn manuscript. So, unless you are publicizing the fact that your unpublished manuscript is registered with the Copyright Office, and your fans are enthusiastic enough to make the trip to Washington D.C., or you are involved in litigation where your manuscript is being used as evidence, it is unlikely that anyone (besides the registration specialists at the Copyright Office) will ever read it. For many authors, the benefits of obtaining a registration outweigh the risk of a zealous fan prematurely leaking major plot points and spoilers ahead of publication.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.



Published January 12th, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
