Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 26
Share on Social
THANKSGIVING AND BALLOONING IP RIGHTS
Thanksgiving: turkey, pumpkin (or sweet potato) pie, family gatherings, and of course, a five-story floating Poppin’ Fresh.
Yesterday, many Americans focused on the fare and family on Turkey Day, true to tradition. Many also watched an invasion of New York by cartoon mascots that came to “life” in gargantuan helium, hovering form. It was the Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade’s giant balloon character lineup.
While I have long associated the measurements of Thanksgiving with pounds, ounces, tablespoons, teaspoons, and how many belt notches to let out, a read through the lineup of these floating friends provides some interesting measurements (click on each character to see the numbers here): building stories, bicycle lengths, and taxi cab widths.
Poppin’ Fresh measured five stories tall and five taxi cabs wide. Grogu, aka “baby Yoda,” had immense specs for a character so small: three stories tall and four bicycles long.
These airborne animations are not just rich in size but also in intellectual property. Take the Doughboy, born in 1965, a/ka/ Poppin’ Fresh, which is protected by at least seven U.S. trademark registrations (e.g., Reg. Nos. 3068336, 2607725, and 1669633) and five U.S. copyright registrations (e.g. Reg. Nos. VAu000311872 and VA0000550358), and the name DOUGHBOY is subject to at least two U.S. trademark registrations (Reg. Nos. 4631146 and 2764538). Hoo hoo, that’s a lot of intellectual property.
Similarly, the most famous baby in the galaxy, Grogu, has its name protected by at least seven U.S. trademark registrations (e.g., Reg. Nos. 7108391, 7081208, and 6944051) and its image protected by copyright registrations for three posters in which the character appears (Reg. Nos. VA0002344190, VA0002349688, and VA0002330022). Grogu is also the subject of 19 style and development guides protected by U.S. Copyright Registrations (e.g., Reg. Nos. VA0002350171, VAu001442474, and VA0002321709).
These registrations—trademark or copyright—protect very different rights.
Trademarks are marks of trade—they “mark” the “trade” of the owner, identifying to consumers the source of the products.
Take the three Poppin’ Fresh trademark registrations linked above. The registrations identify flat bread, frosting, and dry hot roll mixes, respectively. Similarly, the GROGU registrations identify products such as clothing, beverageware, sunglasses, and bags (among other goods).
These registrations do not give Pillsbury and Lucasfilm the right to use the pokable Doughboy or the name GROGU for any and all things. Rather, these marks serve to indicate the source of the particular products and “related” goods and services.
Even though the trademark registrations specify particular goods, if the trademarks have achieved “fame” (recognition transcending their specific industry), that famousness confers rights far beyond the goods listed in the registrations.
That the Doughboy and Grogu floated through the streets of New York yesterday might be a fair indication of fame.
Copyrights are very different, conferring the right to prevent others from copying (and reproducing, distributing, performing, displaying, and making derivatives). Copyrights protect how ideas are expressed, not the ideas themselves.
Trademarks protect brands to identify sources, copyrights protect expression. Sometimes, both protections can apply to a single creation, as with Poppin’ Fresh and other characters that are used as brands.
Both types of protections are valuable to their owners as they seek to drive value in the brands and their expressions. In the case of Grogu, the “force”-wielding critter is both a desirable brand and a character that third parties want to use on their products and services to sell to fans, and will pay royalties to the owner for that right. These licenses usually are accompanied by a “style guide” that dictates and limits how the licensee can use and depict the licensed property. As noted above, Grogu is the featured character for many Lucasfilm Ltd. Inc. style guides that are protected by U.S. copyright registrations.
Whether the Grogu use in behemoth balloon form was specified in the style guides or not, you can bet that a copyright and/or trademark license was behind Grogu’s levitation act through the streets of Manhattan yesterday. In fact, Funko, a toymaker and licensee of Lucasfilm, manufactured the giant floating feature of the tiny Jedi creature.
Alexander JSW Johnson is an attorney at Fishman Stewart with more than 10 years of extensive experience in trademark and intellectual property matters. He works in the firm’s Trademark Practice Group. He holds a B.A. in Art (studio emphasis) and Journalism.
Shirt Traveler’s Journey at the Copyright Small Claims Court

Related Content from Fishman Stewart
When it comes to Super Bowl fashion, jerseys are always in, but only the kind that are authentic and officially licensed.
Giving credit to an author is a nice gesture, but not knowing the rules can get you into trouble.
The shift from “owning a thing” to “holding a key” changes everything about how we consume media - and it brings us to a critical showdown in the world of IP.
In recent years, companies have gravitated toward a visual trend: the minimalist logo. While some critics dismiss the trend, the shift toward minimalism is rooted in something else other than fashion.
When the Oakland Athletics announced plans to relocate to Las Vegas in 2028, many fans were excited. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently threw a curveball by refusing the team’s trademark applications for “Las Vegas Athletics” and “Vegas Athletics.”
Advances in molecular biology have an uncanny knack of doing two things at once: saving lives and giving U.S. patent law a persistent headache.
Artificial Christmas trees have become an enduring symbol of holiday cheer, blending tradition with innovation. Today, they are celebrated for their convenience, sustainability, and versatility, but their story began centuries ago as a creative solution to environmental and safety concerns.
Doosan Bobcat North America filed federal and international lawsuits against Caterpillar alleging Caterpillar improperly reverse engineered loader components.
Intellectual property specialty law firm Fishman Stewart PLLC is pleased to welcome Brian T. Corby as the firm’s first Chief Operating Officer.
Nothing warms the holiday spirit quite like a copyright lawsuit over a light-up reindeer. Back in 2019, two companies went head-to-head over just that when Enchant sued Glowco for copyright infringement.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®

