Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 4
Share on Social
Taylor Swift Deepfakes Make Bad Blood with Fans
By Kristyn Webb
Recently, some sexually explicit photographs of Taylor Swift went viral on social media platform X (formerly Twitter). These images were deepfakes—AI generated images of Swift. The issue of deepfakes has been making headlines as the US enters another presidential election cycle, due largely to concerns over the potentially deleterious effects of misinformation on voters.
Congress is considering various bills to try to curb the spread of deepfakes online, including criminal and civil penalties for unauthorized production of deepfake content. Swift’s fans did not wait for a Congressional act. Instead, they took up the online campaign by flooding social media with positive images of Swift and the hashtag #ProtectTaylorSwift.
Not everyone has the enormous and engaged fan base of Taylor Swift. It is estimated that 99% of deep fakes target women and 96% depict sexual content. While this issue clearly is one of violence against women, it may take the threat of an election loss due to deepfake campaign videos to persuade Congress of the urgency of the threats posed by synthetic media. Current laws are generally inadequate to counter this problem. Copyright law protects the content creator who makes the work from any unauthorized reproduction of the work—not necessarily the person who is depicted in the work. Trademark law protects brand owners from use of similar trademarks that might confuse consumers—not necessarily a person’s likeness. A patchwork of state statutes and common law currently exist to protect an individual’s name, image, and likeness, but these laws may be too undeveloped or antiquated to fully address this new use of technology.
Perhaps as the election cycle heats up, or as more celebrities are victimized, the law will get a nudge toward addressing the issues surrounding deepfakes.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Published February 9, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
When it comes to Super Bowl fashion, jerseys are always in, but only the kind that are authentic and officially licensed.
Giving credit to an author is a nice gesture, but not knowing the rules can get you into trouble.
The shift from “owning a thing” to “holding a key” changes everything about how we consume media - and it brings us to a critical showdown in the world of IP.
In recent years, companies have gravitated toward a visual trend: the minimalist logo. While some critics dismiss the trend, the shift toward minimalism is rooted in something else other than fashion.
When the Oakland Athletics announced plans to relocate to Las Vegas in 2028, many fans were excited. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently threw a curveball by refusing the team’s trademark applications for “Las Vegas Athletics” and “Vegas Athletics.”
Advances in molecular biology have an uncanny knack of doing two things at once: saving lives and giving U.S. patent law a persistent headache.
Artificial Christmas trees have become an enduring symbol of holiday cheer, blending tradition with innovation. Today, they are celebrated for their convenience, sustainability, and versatility, but their story began centuries ago as a creative solution to environmental and safety concerns.
Doosan Bobcat North America filed federal and international lawsuits against Caterpillar alleging Caterpillar improperly reverse engineered loader components.
Nothing warms the holiday spirit quite like a copyright lawsuit over a light-up reindeer. Back in 2019, two companies went head-to-head over just that when Enchant sued Glowco for copyright infringement.
The real tech revolution in sports right now is being powered by AI that uses data from wearable sensors - and crunches numbers faster than any coach with a clipboard could.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
