Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 24, Issue 4
Share on Social
Taylor Swift Deepfakes Make Bad Blood with Fans
By Kristyn Webb
Recently, some sexually explicit photographs of Taylor Swift went viral on social media platform X (formerly Twitter). These images were deepfakes—AI generated images of Swift. The issue of deepfakes has been making headlines as the US enters another presidential election cycle, due largely to concerns over the potentially deleterious effects of misinformation on voters.
Congress is considering various bills to try to curb the spread of deepfakes online, including criminal and civil penalties for unauthorized production of deepfake content. Swift’s fans did not wait for a Congressional act. Instead, they took up the online campaign by flooding social media with positive images of Swift and the hashtag #ProtectTaylorSwift.
Not everyone has the enormous and engaged fan base of Taylor Swift. It is estimated that 99% of deep fakes target women and 96% depict sexual content. While this issue clearly is one of violence against women, it may take the threat of an election loss due to deepfake campaign videos to persuade Congress of the urgency of the threats posed by synthetic media. Current laws are generally inadequate to counter this problem. Copyright law protects the content creator who makes the work from any unauthorized reproduction of the work—not necessarily the person who is depicted in the work. Trademark law protects brand owners from use of similar trademarks that might confuse consumers—not necessarily a person’s likeness. A patchwork of state statutes and common law currently exist to protect an individual’s name, image, and likeness, but these laws may be too undeveloped or antiquated to fully address this new use of technology.
Perhaps as the election cycle heats up, or as more celebrities are victimized, the law will get a nudge toward addressing the issues surrounding deepfakes.
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and holds a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law from King’s College London.
Published February 9, 2024
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
