Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 22, Issue 21
Share on Social
LUKA DONCIC is Owned by His Mom. Maybe.
The 2022-2023 NBA season kicked off just a couple days ago. While some may say Luka Doncic owns the league (figuratively speaking), Doncic’s mom owns LUKA DONCIC (literally speaking). More accurately, Doncic’s mother, Mirjam Poterbin, owns a U.S. trademark registration for the logo shown below:
Poterbin had assisted Doncic with his business affairs since he signed with Real Madrid at age 13 until recently. In 2018, Poterbin filed the above application that included a written consent signed by then-19-year-old Doncic. Consents are routinely used at the Trademark Office to demonstrate a grant of rights to adopt one’s name, image, or likeness—or “NIL” rights as they are often referred to—as (part of) a trademark. In receiving Doncic’s written consent, Poterbin received the right to use LUKA DONCIC as an indicator of source of various goods and services.
Now age 23, Doncic is attempting one of his trademark trick shots (pun intended).
Doncic attempted to unilaterally revoke his consent in 2021, and in September 2022, petitioned to cancel his mother’s registration. Notably, Doncic has filed three new trademark applications incorporating his name, and two have been rejected by the U.S. Trademark Office, citing the LUKA DONCIC 7 registration as being “confusingly similar.” (The third application is awaiting examination.)
Poterbin just this week moved to dismiss the cancellation. Her motion argues that Doncic executed a valid consent and that his revocation attempt is invalid as unilateral, among other legal arguments exchanged.
In basketball terms, Doncic’s mom is blocking his shot.
The dispute raises broad-reaching questions: Should a 19-year old’s consent to their NIL rights be binding as they mature? Should unilateral revocation of NIL rights be permitted under certain circumstances? Should it matter that this was a mother who managed the business affairs of her child?
These questions are particularly poignant in the modern era of U.S. college athletics that, since June 2021, permits 18- to 23-year-old “student-athletes” to monetize their NIL rights.
Winning this cancellation could prove to be among the tougher buckets of Doncic’s young career.
To learn more about trademark registration and name, image, or likeness consents, contact Alex at ajohnson@fishstewip.com, 248-594-0614, or find him on LinkedIn.
Alexander JSW Johnson is an attorney at Fishman Stewart with over nine years of experience in trademark and intellectual property matters. He works in the firm’s trademark practice group. He holds a B.A. in Art (studio emphasis) and Journalism. Check out his full bio here.
Published October 21, 2022
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
This practice is often called the “Poor Man’s Copyright” and the idea has been around for a long time. The theory is that mailing a copy of a work to yourself will provide you with certain legal rights akin to a copyright registration so long as the envelope remains sealed and bears a postmark by the United States Postal Service.
Public Domain Day is celebrated on January 1st and commemorates the expiration of copyright protection for certain creative works. US copyright law provides the copyright owner with certain exclusive rights for a limited time, after which the works fall into the public domain.
Unlike the Matrix, Star Wars, and Austin Powers, respectively, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, or ChatGPT, is not a robot in disguise or a bot of science fiction. We, the users, provide prompts in text form, and ChatGPT converses in response to the prompts.
Recently, we filed an application to register the copyright for Finny the Fish. In the United States, and in many other countries, copyright protection arises at the moment a work is fixed in tangible medium. So, why would we take the extra step to register Finny’s copyright?
With the 2022 midterms (almost) in the rearview mirror, political junkies are now free to turn their full attention to the 2024 presidential election. Today’s focus is on the tug of war that can occur when candidates play music at campaign events.
Both trademark law and copyright law may protect your logo, although the protection they provide differs. Trademark law would prohibit the unauthorized use of another’s logo that is sufficiently similar to your logo such that it is likely to cause confusion in the marketplace.
In the U.S., copyright protection generally does not extend to “useful” articles, like shoes, but can protect the designs on shoes, like that of the Yeezy Boost 350 sneakers. However, in Italy, the global fashion powerhouse since the 15th century, copyright law can protect shoes—like Moon Boots.
Under US copyright law, in most instances, if an independent designer creates your logo, then the independent designer, not you as the contracting party, would own the copyright.
Humans have been making and using musical instruments since at least the Paleolithic age—long before patent systems were put into place to protect inventions.
A trademark lawsuit brought by Vans against MSCHF, a Brooklyn-based art collective behind musician/artist Tyga’s “Wavy Baby” sneaker design.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
