Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 14
Share on Social
From Quill to Copyright: The First US Copyright Registration
By Kristyn Webb
Have you ever wondered what was the very first work to receive a copyright registration in the United States? Perhaps you have wondered. Perhaps you know the answer. If not, here is a hint: it is a type of book that might be studied by children like Dev Shah, the fourteen year old from Florida who correctly spelled “psammophile” to win first place at the Scripps National Spelling Bee earlier this year.
Before we get to the answer, let’s set the scene with the backstory for context. The year was 1790—only seven years after the signing of the Treaty of Paris which formally recognized the independence of the US from Great Britain and one year after George Washington, the first US president, took office. Congress had just passed the nation’s first federal copyright statute: the Copyright Act of 1790. Washington picked up his quill and signed the bill into law on May 31, 1790.
That statute was very narrow and only granted copyright protection to books, maps, and charts for an initial term of 14 years, and a renewal period of another 14 years. Nonetheless, just days after the law was enacted, John Barry, a distinguished bookseller and printer based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, saw the significance of protecting intellectual property in a rapidly developing nation. On June 9, 1790, Barry registered the “Philadelphia Spelling Book” which aimed to provide education and literacy to young learners, serving as a valuable resource for spelling, vocabulary, and pronunciation. Because the US Copyright Office was not yet in existence (and would not exist until 80 years later), Barry registered the copyright in his book with the U.S. District Court of Pennsylvania.
The book, while relatively modest in scope, played a pivotal role in demonstrating the necessity of copyright laws to safeguard the creative endeavors of authors and publishers. The successful registration of Barry’s work under the Copyright Act of 1790 set a precedent and paved the way for countless authors, artists, and mapmakers to follow suit, safeguarding their creations and encouraging a vibrant cultural landscape.
Perhaps Barry’s book also achieved its aim of instilling goals of good spelling in the nation’s youth. The Scripps National Spelling Bee, an annual competition for children fourteen and under who compete to be the top speller, is a televised event that is watched by 7.5 million people. Again, congratulations to Dev Shah on his win!
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and is currently earning a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law at King’s College London.

Published July 28, 2023


Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
