Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 22, Issue 7
Share on Social
This is the Way: Disney’s Path to Protecting Baby Yoda
By Melissa M. Chapman
As Disney+ subscribers tuned into The Mandalorian in November of 2019, they could not have expected the break-through character that was about to be introduced into the Star Wars universe: Grogu, commonly referred to as “Baby Yoda” or “The Child.” Grogu quickly became one of the most popular television show characters of recent history. But what exactly made this character so special?
Despite the character’s reception as cute and meme-worthy, the surprise and delight of an unannounced character may have also played a role in the character’s success. Star Wars ran into issues in the past with plotlines and new characters being spoiled ahead of a movie release. For example, trading cards released in 1980 revealed Han Solo encased in carbonite, spoiling his unfortunate “fate” well before the release of Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back. More recently, LucasFilm filed a new trademark application for Boba Fett ahead of the fan-favorite character’s appearance in Season 2 of The Mandalorian. Viewers lurking the internet for spoilers found the trademark application, leading to theories of Boba Fett’s appearance before his episode aired.
Sensing Grogu’s potential, the character was deliberately kept secret by Disney. Grogu was withheld from all pre-release marketing and merchandise, screeners of the pilot episode were not distributed, and no trademark applications regarding the character were filed. When Grogu finally hit the screen, the surprise appearance skyrocketed him to fame.
However, secrecy came at a price. With a release so close to the holiday season and no official merchandise yet available, fans turned to unlicensed merchandise and products featuring the character from websites like Etsy and Amazon Marketplace. In fact, Disney – normally a strict enforcer of its intellectual property – seemingly allowed unauthorized merchandise to continue to be sold until it was prepared to file its trademark applications and make available its official merchandise. It is estimated that Disney potentially missed out on $2.7 million in potential revenue, simply due to the delay in releasing official Grogu merchandise, after the holiday season. This leads to the question: Was it worth it?
Infamous for its aggressive protection of intellectual property, it was uncharacteristic of Disney to not file a trademark application or otherwise protect the Grogu intellectual property prior to the show’s release. While the company may have left merchandise sales on the table, the explosion of internet fame raised significant awareness of the television show. The Mandalorian landed at No. 14 on Nielsen’s overall list of most watched streaming TV shows and movies of 2020, and No. 5 on Nielsen’s list of top streaming original series of 2020. Moreover, interest in Grogu helped Disney+ amass over 26 million subscribers to its streaming services within the first three months after launching.
While we are unable to say “This is always the way”, the strategy worked for Disney in this instance. The numbers speak for themselves. The long-term value of keeping “Baby Yoda” a secret played out well in the Star Wars galaxy.
Published April 1, 2022
Finny continues his adventures around the world!
This week, Finny was spotted at Trafalgar Square in England, Oceanside Pier in California, and Central Park in New York. Follow Finny and see more of his adventures HERE.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
September 19th is International Talk Like a Pirate Day. In terms of intellectual property, “pirating” refers to the unauthorized copying, distribution, or use of someone else's creative work without their permission, and often for personal or financial gain.
School names and their indicia are now a big source of revenue and local schools’ merchandise is found alongside college and pro sports merchandise. However, included with the increased visibility from the monetization and use of school names and mascots are trademark infringement risks.
National Red Wine Day is observed each year on August 28th. This year, to celebrate, we are sharing a fun story about wine, trademarks, and legal battle over the rights to use a family name on wine labels.
Have you ever wondered what was the very first work to receive a copyright registration in the United States?
The words “generative artificial intelligence” or “generative AI” have been crowding headlines for months with stories about the potential benefits and perils to humans. This article breaks down the top questions and answers we encounter regarding AI and intellectual property.
How many ways are there to tape a banana to a wall? Yes, this is a serious legal question. In fact, this was the question presented in a recent copyright infringement lawsuit in Florida.
Under US copyright law, to receive protection, a work must be “fixed” which means that a work must be expressed or embodied in a material medium that lasts for more than a transitory period.
In a rare unanimous decision, the Supreme Court sided with Jack Daniel’s Properties, reversing the Ninth Circuit decision that found VIP Products’ dog chew toy, a non-infringing parody of the trademark rights Jack Daniel’s holds in its name, JACK DANIEL’S, OLD NO. 7, the label, and bottle design.
People like tacos on Tuesdays. They just do. It’s even fun to say: “Taco Tuesday.” But since 1995, Registrant has owned a federal trademark registration for “Taco Tuesday.” Not cool.
The US Copyright Office recently made headlines for partially revoking a copyright registration it previously issued for an AI-generated graphic novel. Artist Kristina Kashtanova used the Midjourney platform to create images that she included in her graphic novel called Zarya of the Dawn.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
