Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart
Mini Article – Volume 23, Issue 12
Share on Social
Copyright and Fireworks
By Kristyn Webb
According to the US Copyright Office, a fireworks display is not eligible for copyright protection, but a photograph of a fireworks display may be protected. Under US copyright law, to receive protection, a work must be “fixed” which means that a work must be expressed or embodied in a material medium that lasts for more than a transitory period.
This means that a song you compose in your head and sing aloud would not be subject to copyright protection unless you write it down or record your performance and thus “fix” it. Ironically, if someone else recorded your performance—without your consent—and thus “fixed” it, that person may be liable to you for copyright infringement. However, this only applies in cases of musical performances. This is not the case with fireworks, where an unauthorized photograph would “fix” an otherwise “unfixed” fireworks display and give the person lighting the fuse a claim of copyright infringement against the person clicking the shutter button.
In France, however, copyright law does protect a fireworks display. In a court case from 1992, the French Supreme Court (the Cour de Cassation) held that a fireworks display with lighting effects from projectors was protected by copyright law, and the unauthorized sale of postcards showing a photograph of the fireworks display infringed the show designer’s copyright.
So, if you are a globetrotting fireworks tourist, check your local laws before taking any unauthorized photos or videos! And for insight into fireworks technology and patents, check out this Fish Tank article by Paul Ratzmann!
Kristyn Webb is the Group Leader of Fishman Stewart’s Copyright Practice Group, and is currently earning a Master’s Degree in Copyright Law at King’s College London.
Published June 30, 2023
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
Comerica Park becomes Fifth Third Park in 2027. Here’s how stadium naming rights work as IP licensing and what Fifth Third gains beyond fan approval.
As any trademark lawyer will tell clients considering a rebrand, the adoption of any new trademark involves risk. A search can identify potentially conflicting trademarks that could pose problems for use and/or registration of a new trademark.
Why would the United States grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations while simultaneously seeking to promote competition and innovation? The answer lies in the Patent Act of 1790, which established a framework that still shapes patent law today.
Before a brand makes headlines for the right reasons, it helps to make sure someone else doesn’t already own the name. A recent dispute involving Tesla offers a timely reminder that a great brand name can become an expensive problem.
One second became a surprisingly complicated piece of technology, intellectual property and sports governance in the 2026 collegiate season opening game.
With the end of Hot Dog Season quickly approaching, now is a good time to reflect on the innovative new growth that made this season what it is today.
The Ninth Circuit just reversed course on Jack Daniel's dilution claim against the 'Bad Spaniels' dog toy, vacating the injunction and ruling that parody humor alone doesn't prove reputational harm. Here's what the decision means for brand owners pursuing tarnishment claims.
The trading card industry is booming again - and what makes this moment different is not who holds the cards, literally and figuratively, but how the trading card space is rapidly evolving.
Imagine paying millions of dollars for the naming rights to a stadium—only to have your brand hidden behind a giant white tarp. That’s exactly what happened to Levi Strauss during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®
