Intellectual Property Insights from Fishman Stewart PLLC
Newsletter – Volume 23, Issue 24
Share on Social
COOL MOVES AND MAGIC TRICKS
By Barbara Mandell
Intellectual property lawyers don’t just prepare arcane treatises on scientific and technological topics, i.e., patent applications. We also have a host of cool moves and magic tricks up our sleeves. Here are a few:
We can launch proceedings to take down an entire website if the URL/domain name associated with that website is confusingly similar to one of our client’s registered trademarks. To accomplish the takedown, we would also need to establish that: (1) the owner of the URL has no legitimate interests in the domain name; and (2) the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. One example of a bad faith domain name is when the opposing party engages in typo-squatting, or wrongfully registers a domain name with a slight modification of a famous domain name. Some examples of typo-squatting are wallmart.com or jetspiza.com. One goal of typo-squatting is to capture the legitimate company’s customers who fail to notice that they are clicking on an erroneous URL.
This magic proceeding is known as a UDRP, or Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding. The UDRP was introduced in 1999 by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to protect the integrity of the then-budding Internet. The two remedies available to a trademark holder are cancellation of the infringing domain name registration or transfer of that registration to the trademark holder. Trademark holders have a choice of forums in which to bring a UDRP. We have used the National Arbitration Forum.
Another magic “take-down” proceeding we can bring is one under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act), against a website owner and/or an Online Service Provider if the client’s copyrighted intellectual property is found online without permission. A client may also initiate this proceeding on its own. See an example form here.
Amazon and other websites also have provisions for the takedown of, for example, counterfeit products, such as their infringement reporting tool. A critical first step to do a take-down on Amazon is to register your brand with the Amazon brand registry. Amazon sometimes requires verification to confirm that the agent represents the rights owner and may ask for the name and phone number of the Company’s representative, along with its Business Tax I.D. Even taking into account the verifications, the whole process may take little more than a day for owners of active U.S. trademark registrations and applications on the principal register.
What happens if you’re at a trade show and there’s a booth with your product, or what seems to be your product, but is actually a counterfeit? We can help here as well by filing a seizure action in the federal court located in the trade show’s jurisdiction such as, for example, Las Vegas.
Not surprisingly, the federal court in Las Vegas has a lot of experience with such proceedings. Thus, for example, when a patent holder files a patent infringement complaint, usually at the beginning of a trade show, the holder would also file an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). Among other things, these TROs would prohibit the defendant from offering to sell or selling infringing items at the show (or elsewhere in the United States) and from processing payment on the sales. TROs will sometimes order that all web hosting companies having notice of the Court’s Order take any action necessary to remove the infringing products. Plaintiffs frequently include in their motions for emergency relief a request for a seizure order, allowing federal marshals to enter the floor of the show and remove the counterfeit products.
So, the next time you need an Intellectual Property lawyer for a cool move or a magic trick, let us know!
Barbara Mandell is a partner at the firm. She has over 30 years’ experience in complex litigation. Her practice is focused on litigating, arbitrating and counseling her clients on patent, trademark and licensing matters as well as antitrust law.
Related Content from Fishman Stewart
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday on July 4th, many communities are replacing or supplementing traditional fireworks with drone-based light shows - which prompts the question of intellectual property protection.
The fun internet trend of promoting "dupes" has officially crossed the trademark line and everyday content creators are finding themselves in the crosshairs of multimillion-dollar corporate lawsuits.
Firm Managing Partner Michael B. Stewart has again been included in the IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Professionals – 2026.
The FIFA World Cup is global football (or soccer) at its highest level. It is, however, also one of the most carefully crafted displays of intellectual property (IP) in the world.
Trademark owners are often cast as villains when they send cease-and-desist letters. But in trademark law, failing to enforce rights can sometimes create bigger problems than enforcing them.
Women’s sports are having a moment, and not a small one. And right alongside that rise: the business of women’s sports is heating up, including some surprisingly dramatic trademark battles.
Fishman Stewart PLLC is pleased to announce that Hamad Sheer, a recent graduate in computer engineering, was awarded a $1,000 scholarship for his winning essay as part of Fishman Stewart’s sponsorship of The Engineering Society of Detroit’s (ESD) annual Engineering Student Writing Contest.
The idea that someone might “own” a piece of DNA raises a slightly uncomfortable question: can you really patent something that exists inside all of us?
Fishman Stewart is adding pages to its playbook with the addition of two new attorneys in its sports law practice.
Forbes reported that more than 1.5 million bots on an AI agent-driven social network appear to have created a new religion for themselves, the Church of Molt, with congregants adopting the name of “Crustafarians.”
IDENTIFYING, SECURING AND ADVANCING CREATIVITY®

